My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00291
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:35 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:37:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1962
Author
IBWC
Title
Mexican Water Treaty -Appendix B - Water Quality A Missing
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />sa as to. deliver water to Mexico. that was sa saline as to. be <br />tatally' useless to. Mexico., Mexico. wauld have to. take that, <br />under the treaty? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. That is my awn apinian, sir; but I want <br />to. paint aut again that while that was the intent af the language <br />af the treaty, I am nat an attarney. There will be witnesses <br />far the Six State Cammittee who. are attarneys and can probably <br />go. into. that further with yau fram the legal stand paint . I can- <br />nat, sir; I can anly tell yau what the intent was. <br />"Senatar DOWNEY. But yau have already tald us that <br />there are dacuments signed by the Mexican Gavernment in <br />which they agree to. take water regardless af its quality. <br />"Mr. TIPTON. No., sir; I did nat make any such statement. <br />"Senatar DOWNEY. What was it, then? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. I tald you that there was a pas sage af mema- <br />randa between the negatiators which indicated what aur intent <br />was, and the language was finally written araund that. There was <br />nathing signed. <br />"Senatar DOWNEY. It was a memarandum an aur part? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. Yes, sir. <br />"Senatar DOWNEY. Sa far as yau knaw, is there any <br />memarandum an the part af the Gavernment af Mexico. stating <br />that it will take water which is nat usable? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. Senatar, yau are assuming that this water <br />is nat usable. I am nat assuming that it will nat be usable, and <br />neither were the Mexican negatiatars. I think yau are making <br />an assumptian which is nat true. <br />"Senatar DOWNEY. I understaad yau this marning to. say <br />that there had been memaranda signed by both Gavernments. <br />. __ __ ___~Mr ~IPTON. I did not mean to. canvey that impressian. <br />I meant that there were memoranda passed from the American <br />negatiatars to. the Mexican negatiatars indicating plainly what <br />the intent af the American negatiatars was; and there was nat <br />anly ane; there were several. As a result af that the American <br />demands were accepted and there was written into. the treaty <br />the present language which is suppased to. caver the situatian. <br />Whether it daes ar whether it daes nat is a questian af inter- <br />pretatian af language and a questian af legal interpretatian af <br />language. But the language is there to express an intent, and <br />I knaw what the intent was. <br />"Senatar DOWNEY. On the part af the United States? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. On the part af the Mexican negatiatars. <br />"Senatar DOWNEY. Is the intent an the part af the Mexican <br />negatiatars expressed in writing? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. I do. nat knaw, sir; but I am just telling yau <br />that as ane af the negatiatars, whether it was in writing ar nat, <br />it was understaod." <br /> <br />B 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.