My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00291
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:35 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:37:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1962
Author
IBWC
Title
Mexican Water Treaty -Appendix B - Water Quality A Missing
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />be available far irrigatian, I suppase that yau farmed yaur apinian <br />merely fram the, l~rlguage af the treaty itself, without regi'lr,J to. <br />thase cdnversatians and exchang,es between the two. Gavernments <br />that yau have spaken af. Wauld yau still be af the apinian that <br />from the language af the treaty itself a caurt ar an internatianal <br />arbitratian tribunal wauld nat hald that lviexica was entitled to. <br />water that was fit for irrigatian purpases? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. That is my unqualified apinian, Senator, be- <br />cause the language af the treaty resulted from these canversatians <br />that yau mentian, and the language af the treaty was just as plain <br />as it was passible to. make it, and in my unqualified apinian the <br />language af the treaty is such that Mexico cauld nat ask far mare <br />water than 1,500,000 acre-feet far any purpase whatsaever. <br />"Senatar DOWNEY. Yau do. nat think that just adding three <br />simple words, 'regardless af quality, ' wauld have made it any <br />plainer? <br />"Mr. TIPTON, The language af the treaty is perfectly plain. <br />"Senatar DOWNEY. Naw, Mr. Tiptan, yau say that if the <br />treaty had included the expressian, 'regardless af quality,' that <br />might perhaps have prevented the Mexican Senate fram ratifying <br />the treaty? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. The anes in the Mexican Senate are nat sa <br />canversant with the situatian an the river as thase who. negatiated <br />the treaty. Thase who. negatiated the treaty understaad fully what <br />they were daing. They understand fully what the canditian might <br />be ultimately, while thase in the Senate might nat be canversant <br />with that canditian. The language in the treaty is plain and it <br />m".ans ane thing, and ane thing anly, and the anes who. negati- <br />ated this treaty for Mexico. understand it. They also. understand <br />a!?9~~hat_~h~3!lality might be J:1Q<ieLultilI!.ates_@s:l~tion~.._In____ <br />other wards, there was no tendency on the part af the United <br />States negatiatars to. wark aut samething that was bad far Mexico, <br />and Mexico.' s negatiatars, an the ather hand, knew plainly what <br />they were daing, and the language was agreed to with ane purpr"'G <br />in mind, and they understand it." <br /> <br />On pages 342-43 the fallawing additional exchange taok place: <br /> <br />"Senatar DOVl!NEY. And it is recited that the water shall <br />come fram any and all saurces. <br />"Mr. TIPTON. That was put in to caver drainage. That was <br />the intent, Senatar, and there is no. questian abaut it. <br />"Senator DOW NEY. Yau are still firmly af opinion that <br />even thaugh we in the United States could work out aur irrig::tion <br /> <br />B 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.