My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00166
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00166
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:03 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:33:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.960
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations -- Lower Colorado Comprehensive Framework Study
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1971
Title
Lower Colorado Region Comprehensive Framework Study -- Appendix IV - Economic Base and Projection for 1980 2000 2020
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />~:') <br /> <br />times in the Little Colorado Subregion. The large increases are due <br />primarily to an increase in the proportion of the total water used in <br />those secto~s of the economy where value added per unit of water is <br />relatively high. However, a part of the increase is attributable to <br />projected technological advances. <br /> <br />.... <br />~. <br />.I!"'>. <br /> <br />Since, as is generally recognized, value added to the economy re- <br />lated to water directly and indirectly used varies greatly from sector <br />to sector, transferring water from one use to another mayor may not <br />have a benef.icial effect on the economy. The factors relating value <br />added, and direct and indirect requirements for water, land, and labor <br />to final demand, referred to above, can be used as illustrated in the <br />appendix to analyze the effects of alternative uses of water. These <br />factors also! can be used, as illustrated in the appendix, to analyze the <br />effects of increasing or decreasing the amount of water available. <br /> <br />The modified OBE-ERS projections indicated some significant changes <br />in production compared with the OBE-ERS projections. Since the OBE-ERS <br />regional projections were a part of a coordinated set of national-inter- <br />regional projections which equated demand with supply, an investigation <br />was made to the extent data were available, to determine the effect the <br />changes would have on prices of the commodities involved. The analysis <br />indicated the higher level of production of vegetables and citrus with <br />the modified OBE-ERSprojections would depress prices somewhat through- <br />out the projection time frame, the reduction in vegetable prices increas- <br />ing to about 5 percent in 2000 and 2020, and the reduction in citrus <br />prices increasing to about 4 percent in the year 2020. The reductions <br />would be larger, of course, if other regions also exceed the baseline <br />projections, 'as is the case in the California Region. The reduction in <br />beef production and the increase in milk production are not expected to <br />have much effect on prices of the commodities. <br /> <br />Changes .in commodity prices indicated by alternative sets of pro- <br />jections should be considered in development of asso.ciated framewo.rk <br />plans. <br /> <br />A sensitivity analysis indicates that with total crop production in <br />the Region held constant at the OBE-ERS projected level, a 10 percent in- <br />crease in projected yields causes approximately a 9 percent reduction in <br />the acreage of cropland harvested in the Region, and reduces water re- <br />quired in the'Region by roughly 450,000 acre feet, which amounts to about <br />7 percent of total water required in 1980 and 6 percent in 2020. A 10 <br />percent decrease in projected crop yields causes approximately an 11 per- <br />cent increase in irrigated cropland harvested, and increases total <br />regional water requirements by approximately 550,000 acre feet, which <br />comprises about 8.6 percent of total regional water requirements in 1980 <br />and about 7 percent in 2020. The Gila Subregion accounts for about 75 <br />percent of the change in water requirements in the Region. <br /> <br />x <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.