Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:;.'< <br />;~l <br />" <br />" <br />~: <br />~i: '" <br />" w <br />en <br />, l'\) <br />;, <br />j <br />" <br />~~ <br />..:,,1 <br />" <br />" <br />~.;.; <br />" <br />l <br />... <br />, <br />" <br />4i <br />f, <br />l <br />i <br />I <br />t <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION <br /> <br />Recent ARS activity with reference to the Upper Colorado has come about by <br />redirection of inhouse funds. Level basins are being studied as a surface <br />irrigation method that eliminates surface runoff or tailwater, allows close <br />control of deep percolation, and has a low labor requirement. ~evel basins <br />are less 'sui ted to the Grand Valley, wi th its steeper slopes and shallower <br />soils, than to the Wellton-Mohawk project, However, a survey has shown that <br />about one-third of the Grand Valley may be suitable for level basin systems. <br />Additional research is under way for effective irrigation scheduling and the <br />effect of high, saline water tables on irrigation water requirements. <br /> <br />Another research and development component concerns the evaluation of <br />available automation equipment, development and testing of new devices, <br />and working with farmers to integrate these components into an effective' <br />management system. A number of the shortcomings identified in the action <br />program are being addressed by the research program.' Furthermore, work has <br />,been funded by ARS at Utah State to develop a system of "surge irrigation"' <br />that may help solve the variable infiltration rate problem in Grand Valley; <br />and at Colorado State University to assess the strengths and weaknesses of <br />the ongoing onfarm improvement program in the Grand Valley and to monitor <br />benefits on this program. <br /> <br />Additional research activities include developing means of overcoming the <br />variable infiltration rates already mentioned, improving designs and canal <br />turnout and pipelines to solve problems associated with sediment deposits in <br />pipelines, and developing methods for 'assessing the benefits of'the onfarm" <br />and lateral improvement programs. <br /> <br />INSTITUTIONAL AND INTERAGENCY ACTIVITIES <br /> <br />Continued interagency activities and coordination efforts are ,being <br />maintained in accordance with executed MOU and MOA. The Forum Work Group, <br />the Federal Interagency Salinity Control Committee,and the USDA Salinity <br />Control Coordinating Committee are the primary groups handling interagency' <br />communications and liaison with the Colorado River Basin SalinitY,Control <br />Advisory Council and Forum. <br /> <br />Within USDA, and specifically within SCS, national program leadership has <br />been shifted from the Basin and Area Planning staff to the Water Quality <br />Project Implementation (WQPI) staff. Walter F. Rittall, Director, WQPI, has <br />also been designated the USDA Salinity Control Liaison Officer. <br /> <br />The USDA agencies are also revising the MOU between SCS, ASCS, ARS, CSRS, and <br />ES for the Grand Valley and Uinta Basin projects. Essentially, two separate <br />documents have been combined into one revised MOU for both projects. Formal <br />execution of the revised MOU should occur in 1982, ' <br /> <br />20 <br />