Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..:..c <br />c <br />00 <br />,_""'l <br /> <br />--, <br /> <br />.~~) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />(4) If the three existing irrigation districts so <br /> <br />desire, each should be offered the opportunity to <br /> <br />be the Proposed Organization for the Laterals of <br /> <br />each particular canal administered by such <br /> <br />District, i.e., Palisade Irrigation District for <br /> <br />the Price Canal, Mesa County Irris"ation District <br /> <br />for the Stub Canal and Orchard Mesa Irrigation <br /> <br />District for the Orchard Mesa Can2Ll System. <br /> <br />(5) Lateral ditch corporations could be utilized as <br /> <br />Proposed Organizations, provided t:hat the lateral <br /> <br />ditch corporation law were amended to avoid the <br /> <br />problem discussed in footnote 6, infra and to <br /> <br />clarify that such law could be applicable to a <br /> <br />corporation organized to acquire more than one <br /> <br />lateral. <br /> <br />(6) Further discussions should be held with the <br /> <br />principals of Grand Valley Irriga1:ion Company to <br /> <br />determine what role, if any, such organization <br /> <br />might play in the Proposed Organizations. <br /> <br />(7) New water conservancy district(s) offer the most <br /> <br />appropriate form of new Proposed Organization(s) <br /> <br />for construction, operation and maintenance of <br /> <br />laterals included within a larger area of lands. <br /> <br />(b) Recommendations: <br /> <br />(1) A policy decision be sought as to the number of <br /> <br />Proposed Organizations with which the Secretary <br /> <br />-39- <br />