My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC07634
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC07634
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:11:57 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:34:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8507
Description
River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
4/18/1975
Title
USDA Detailed Work Outline - Rio Grande Type 4 Cooperative Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Major <br />Activity <br />Number <br /> <br />" <br />A.2 (contd) <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />General Procedure <br />and Data Source <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />USDA DETAILED 'WORK OUT:...INE <br />RIO GRANDE TYPE 4 COOPERATIVE STUDY <br />April 1975 <br /> <br />Specific Procedures <br /> <br />f. Identify areas needing drainage where drainage <br />would be physica\1v possible and appears to be <br />~conomical. Work with local SCS employees and <br />local people to determine interest and potential. <br />Survey past reports and update ~ta. <br />g. Determine acreages in lCUs within planning units <br />which would benefit from project drainage. <br />h. Work with state and area range conservationists <br />and FS to determine range site groupings, acreages, <br />AUMs, by planning unit, county, etc. <br />i. Work with local people to determine major needs <br />for improving rangelands. <br />j. Identify major management needs and major vege- <br />tative or mechanical p~actices possible. <br />k. Work with range men to develop various manage- <br />ment alternatives for each range site or group- <br />ing of range sites. <br />I. Each management alternative should be incor- <br />porated into LP matrix. <br />rn. Inventory areas which may be removed from range <br />production due to subdivision. Tabulate total <br />acres by counties being removed. <br />n. Identify impacts on taxes, administrative costs, <br />etc. with land as range vs. subdivision. Also <br />identify impacts on environmental qual ity, <br />natural beauty, wind erosion, irreversible <br />damages. etc. <br />o. Suggest alternatives counties should employ con- <br />sidering NED and EQ. <br /> <br />:Purpose <br /> <br />:Who <br /> <br />Smi th <br /> <br />Smith <br /> <br />Palmer <br />Glasgow <br /> <br />Capurro <br /> <br />Capurro <br /> <br />Eaman <br />FS <br /> <br />Palmer <br />Glasgow <br />Palmer <br /> <br />Palmer <br /> <br />Palmer <br /> <br />:Start <br /> <br />3/76 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />En' <br /> <br />Status! <br />Man-Days <br />SCS: F<;; EPS <br />On90 i ng <br /> <br />Ongoing <br /> <br />FS has done <br />this <br />" <br /> <br />Check wi th COG <br />Use Project <br />Coordinators <br />" <br /> <br />=. <br />= <br />[", <br />....... <br />..... <br />""' <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.