Laserfiche WebLink
<br />GGons <br /> <br />Water Board population figures reflect the same assumptions <br />about rates of in-migration and natural increase as do those <br />of the Denver Regional Council of Governments, although the <br />DRCOG projections from these rates are certainly more current. <br /> <br />(3) Colorado Department of Hiqhways. In 1971, the <br />Colorado Department of H~ghways commissioned the firm of Wil- <br />bur Smith and Associates to prepare a study of future trans- <br />portation needs for the State of Colorado. The report is <br />titled Colorado Hi hwa Classification Needs and Fiscal <br />Study. Inc u e ~n t e vo ume 0 e repor 1t e h conomic <br />Forecast: Population and Motor Vehicle Trends" is a projec- <br />tion of future population levels for the state. The general <br />forecast of the study is as follows: <br /> <br />Colorado's population growth due to natural <br />increase (births less deaths) can be expected to <br />decline slightly in the future. This represents <br />a continuation of the trend toward smaller <br />family sizes in Colorado. For example, the aver- <br />age occupied housing unit in the State in 1960 <br />contained 3.4 persons. In 1970, the same statis- <br />tic yielded a persons-to-household figure of 3.1. <br />Thus, families are indeed getting smaller on the <br />average. However, Colorado has a large percent- <br />age of young persons, as indicated earlier, who <br />will be forming new households and having fami- <br />lies. While statistics show that the families <br />will be smaller in size, the large number of <br />young persons enabling family formation should <br />act to counter the smaller family size to a con- <br />siderable extent. The net result then is that <br />population gain due to natural population in- <br />crease should taper only slightly. <br /> <br />Colorado's population growth due to net in- <br />migration has historically equaled that due to <br />natural increase. The reasons most often stated <br />for moving to a state such as Colorado, employ- <br />ment opportunity, climate, recreation, retire- <br />ment and so on, should continue to exist through <br />1990. As such, there is little reason to expect <br />that the trends in migration of persons should <br />change significantly in the next twenty years. <br />Colorado should continue to grow and prosper <br />much as it has in the last several decades. 11 <br /> <br />y <br /> <br />Wilbur Smith and Associates, "Economic Forecast: Popula- <br />tion and Motor Vehicle Trends", July, 1971, pp. 19-21. <br /> <br />-3- <br />