My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06770
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC06770
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:07:45 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:04:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8541
Description
San Luis Valley Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
10/3/1972
Author
Paul Davis
Title
San Luis Valley Project Closed Basin Division - 1972-1974 - Rebuttal of the Sutherland-Teems-Weaver Presentation Opposing Closed Basin Project, KGIW, 8:40-9:05, 9/29/72
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,L <br /> <br />"'''~l.!../Ol <br />~~ ~; :..: j t ~ <br /> <br /> <br />\ <br />, <br /> <br />-,\ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />extend the period of indebtedness as much as humanly possible <br /> <br />under the present conditions. Mrs. Sutherland's estimate of <br /> <br />the period of indebtedness is optimistic but oot reali"tic. <br /> <br />We are happy to hear that the Concerned Ci tizens Under the <br /> <br />. Closed Basin now no longer propose to substi fute tocal purchase <br /> <br />and opera tion of the Terrace Irriga tioo Company <br /> <br />for the Closed Basin project. It is not and never has been An <br /> <br />acceptable substitute as it is now proposed. <br /> <br />Referring to the eleven assumptions which Mrs. Sutherland <br /> <br />stated that this Board had made before supporting the Closed <br /> <br />Basin legislation as presented over KG1W on Friday, September 29: <br /> <br />First assumption: <br /> <br />The Supreme Court would reac ti va te the <br /> <br />sui t brought by New Mexico and Texas as a result of our in- <br /> <br />debtedness to them. <br /> <br />Mrs. Sutherland stated that is was her opinion that the suit <br /> <br />would not be reactivated if the debt was "whittled down". We <br /> <br />do not know what th.. tern "whittled down" means; howevt'r thi8 <br /> <br />Board has been assured by our Rio Grandf' Compact Commissioner, <br /> <br />by competent lawyers and by personnel of the Colorado Water <br /> <br />Cons,'rvation Board that should we fail to meet our scheduled <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.