My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06770
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC06770
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:07:45 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:04:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8541
Description
San Luis Valley Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
10/3/1972
Author
Paul Davis
Title
San Luis Valley Project Closed Basin Division - 1972-1974 - Rebuttal of the Sutherland-Teems-Weaver Presentation Opposing Closed Basin Project, KGIW, 8:40-9:05, 9/29/72
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />Qao'{ H <br /> <br />'] <br /> <br />'\ <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />ponsibility to those persons and has fulfilled this responsibility <br /> <br />fully in its actions directed toward the development of the author- <br /> <br />izing legislation. <br /> <br />I I. is the unders tanding of th i s Boa I'd tha t the Conce rned <br /> <br />Citizens Under the Closed Basin have circulated a petition opposing <br /> <br />legisla tionauthorizing the project; that after strenuous efforts <br /> <br />approximately 1000 to 1100 signatures have been obtained. This <br /> <br />represents about one out of thirty-five residents of the San Luis <br /> <br />Va lIey. <br /> <br />Mr. Mel Coleman and Mr. Vinis Sutherland. leaders of those <br /> <br />opposing this legislation. met with the Board on the evening of <br /> <br />September 29. 1972. The meeting was devoted to a discussion <br /> <br />during which Mr. Coleman presented the position of those opposing <br /> <br />the bill and members of the Board explained tbeir reasons for <br /> <br />supporting the bill. Mr. Coleman stated that he had not been aware of <br /> <br />the reasons for the Board's support., nor had he taken time t.o <br /> <br />familiarize himself wit.h the many provisions of the proposed pro- <br /> <br />ject. <br /> <br />When the persons organizing the oppos i hon do not understand <br /> <br />the sitlWtion we feel it is possible that many of those signing <br /> <br />the petition are not. aware of the beneficial aspects of the project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.