My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06770
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC06770
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:07:45 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:04:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8541
Description
San Luis Valley Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
10/3/1972
Author
Paul Davis
Title
San Luis Valley Project Closed Basin Division - 1972-1974 - Rebuttal of the Sutherland-Teems-Weaver Presentation Opposing Closed Basin Project, KGIW, 8:40-9:05, 9/29/72
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />\ <br /> <br />OOOHj <br /> <br />'j <br />". <br /> <br />.) <br />" <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />amount of material concerning the'project that is now available. <br /> <br />We feel that most of those now opposing the project would rev"rs,- <br /> <br />their stand and support if for the hcnefi I. of a 11 concerned. <br /> <br />It is difficult to combat the adverse puhl iei t~' that has d~ve- <br /> <br />loped a s a resul I. of the presenta ti ons tha I. ha ve been made by th os~ <br /> <br />opposing the bill. This is particularly true as much of the mat- <br /> <br />erial presented by the opposi tion hl::ls been of an t>IDotional nature <br /> <br />and does not repres~nt the fact. of the mat.ter. <br /> <br />Those heading the opposition, to a gr~a t degree. have substi tuted <br /> <br />emotion for reason and fNJr for facts. For the future ll,'elfare of <br /> <br />the people of the Valley a rebuttal Inu.t be made. This Board of <br /> <br />Directors feels it must present the facts pertaining to the pro- <br /> <br />ject and their reasons for supporting the authorizing legislation <br /> <br />as presented in S. 520. Th~ Board of Directors is adamant in its <br /> <br />position that the projed shall be nonreimbursable. it shall be <br /> <br />operated under local conlt'ol and shall safeguard the rights of the <br /> <br />people of the Valley. Particular car~ was taken in the prepara- <br /> <br />tion of this bi 11 to safeguard the rights of those persons living <br /> <br />close t,o the project, The Board of Directors recognizes its re8- <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.