Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. .. <br /> <br />000302 <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />"Access. Preliminary investigations have been completed for <br />an access road that would ~xtend from Vernal, Utah, on United <br />States Highway No. 40 to I~land Park ~nd that ~!()uld then con- <br />tinue along the south side; of the Green River through V~rlpool <br />Caqyon to the dam site. other routes will be studied during <br />the preconstruction survey~. In the investigations of alter- <br />native routes, consideratipn should be given to the desirability <br />of routing the road by the;constrllction camp and deposits of <br />construction materials. Consideration should also be given to <br />the possibility of locating the road so that it ',ould provide <br />access to facilities of th~ Split "Iountain uni t and permit at <br />least part of the Echo Park construction camp to be used for <br />the Split Mountain unit." , <br /> <br />..' <br /> <br />It will be noted that the ~ureau has materially changed its original <br />statements in the report on this subject and merely states that preliminary in- <br />"'<:"tigations have been completed for 'an access road that will extend from Vernal, <br />Ut'6,\1 on U. S. Highway 40 but that other routes will be studied during the pre- <br />con3truction surveys. The statement also pointed out certain factors which should <br />be considered in finally determining the route of access road or roads. <br /> <br />It would not be reasonable to expect that the Director of Region 4, in <br />submitting his report to Washington, in the absence of rather complete survey and <br />study of the access roads matter, could definitely determine access road location. <br />Colorado's informal comments requested further study of the matter of roao routes <br />to the Echo Park Dam and Reservoir and indicated arguments in favor of a road <br />leaving Highway U. S. 40 in the vicinity of Artesia, Colorado and following a <br />northerly course to the d?~ site. This State also asked the Bureau not only to <br />conduct the necessary surveys and investigations for access routes, but to keep the <br />Staoe and interested groups within the state informed Rnd advised before a final de- <br />cision on the matter is made. The change in the recent report indicates that the <br />Bl'reau will make the additional surveys and, at the appropriate time, there is <br />nothing to indicate that that Federal agency will not keep State and local intere~ <br />advised, as well as giving them an opportunity to be heard. <br /> <br />There is every indication that the National Park and nature lover in- <br />terests will continue their objection to the storage of water at Echo Park. This <br />opposition probably will assume an organized effort when approval of the Colorado <br />River Storage Project and authorization of the initial features thereof are con- <br />sidered by the Congress. Proponents of the project are confident that, with the <br />ruling of the Secretary of the Interior and based upon controlling facts, such <br />opposition will not ultimately be effective to defeat the construction of the Echo <br />Park Dam. However, it may result in the inclusion in the authorization of initial <br />features of the plan for roads which will not only serve construction purposes but <br />also recreational and scenic attractions of the area, These are all unknown fac- <br />tors at this time and efforts to secure a decision now, in view of the status of <br />the report and road surveys and investigations would seem to be premature and might <br />result in delay in securing report status as a basis for project authorization. <br />After all, unless the project is authorized, from the point of view of reclamation <br />Jevelopment, there is no occasion for any access roads. <br />