My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC04953
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
18000-18999
>
WSPC04953
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:41:39 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:56:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272
Description
Colorado River - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - CRBSCP
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/1990
Author
Joseph F Friedkin
Title
International Problem with Mexico Over the Salinity of the Lower Colorado River - Excerpted from Water and the American West - Essays in Honor of Raphael J Moses
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OG2253 <br /> <br />46jFriedkin <br /> <br />In subsequent meetings, the Committee of Fourteen <br />seemed to recognize that unless the United States alleviated the <br />salinity problem, it might have to defend a case brought by <br />Mexico before an international tribunal or an international <br />arbitration panel. Thus, the Committee eventually supported <br />efforts to control salinity, so long as they minimized the re- <br />lease of stored waters and did not impair operations in the <br />Wellton-Mohawk District. This was the basis for Minute No. <br />2IS. Over the five year period of the agreement salinity of de- <br />liveries to Mexico was reduced only about 15 ppm a year. The <br />Committee then recognized that more reductions would be re- <br />quired. It ultimately agreed to a proposal that would have re- <br />sulted in the average annual salinity of the deliveries to Mex- <br />ico being approximately the same as if the WeIlton-Mohawk <br />District were operating in salt balance. Under this "equivalent <br />salt balance" approach, the quantity of salts discharged in the <br />drainage waters would approximately equal the quantity of <br />salts in the waters being diverted to the District. The result~ng <br />annual average salinity of deliveries to Mexico would have <br />been about 1,140 ppm. However, the Mexican negotiators would <br />not accept the United States' proposal as a permanent solution <br />when it was made in late 1971 as they considered the reduction <br />too small. These circumstances formed the background for the <br />June, 1972, meeting in which President Echeverria told Presi- <br />dent Nixon that Mexico's treaty allotment of Colorado River <br />water should be of "the same quality as those diverted to United <br />States userS at Imperial Dam." <br />Given President Nixon's directive and tlle circumstances <br />that existed in 1974, it appears that there was no better solu- <br />tion available than the one that was reached. It was clear that <br />any solution would require elimination of the adverse effects <br />of Wellton-Mohawk drainage waters delivered to Mexico, and <br />would have to protect Colorado River Basin states against /iny <br />loss of water or other resources. In retrospect. however, it ap- <br />pears that there were at least two opportunities to avoid or <br />mitigate the salinity problem prior to 1970 so that it would not <br />become such a major problem requiring costly and difficult <br />solutions. <br />The first opportunity relates to the type of drainage works <br />installed in the Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation District. The Dis- <br />trict is situated along the lower reaches of the Gila River, from <br />a point about five miles above its confluence with the Colorado <br />River, and extending some fifty miles upstream. Settlers began <br />irrigated farming in this area in 1859, diverting waters di- <br />rectly from the Gila River. By the 19205, about 11,000 acres <br />were being irrigated. Later, when upstream developments on <br />the Gila River practically caused flows to disappear along the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.