Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. OG2254 <br /> <br />Salinity of the Lower Colorado River/ 47 <br /> <br />lower reaches. farmers turned to pumplng from the underlying <br />groundwater. This rapidly lowered groundwater levels and in- <br />creased salinity. as the naturally saline groundwater was suc- <br />cessively pumped. reused. and returned to the aquifer. Reports <br />showed concentrations of salt in the aquifer varying from <br />1.500 to 25.000 ppm. and averaglng about 6.000 ppm after sev- <br />eral years of pumplng. <br />In 1950. Congress authorized the Bureau of Reclamation <br />to assist farmers in the Wellton-Mohawk District by <br />construeting a conveyance canal and irrigation works to sup- <br />ply them with Colorado River water. No drainage works were <br />provided with the irrigation works. however. and by 1958 (six <br />years after deliveries began). groundwater levels had risen so <br />much that the District lands were becoming water-logged. A <br />deep well drainage system was then installed to pump waters <br />from the underlying highly saline aquifer and to discharge <br />these waters to the Colorado River. Pumping began in <br />February. 1961. and lowered groundwater levels. but dis- <br />charges of the waters pumped. having a salinity level averaging <br />6.000 ppm. caused the annual average salinity of treaty water <br />deliveries to Mexico to rise sharply from 800 ppm in 1960 to <br />nearly 1.500 ppm In 1962. <br />The United States scientific panel In 1962 found that the <br />problem caused by the WeIIton-Mohawk dralnage wells might <br />be avoided if deep wells were replaced by gravity drains. <br />including tile drains. The United States Geological Survey soli <br />and groundwater scientists supported this view. Waters col- <br />lected in gravity drains and then delivered to Mexico would be <br />much lower in salinity since most of the dralnage would come <br />directly from the applied irrigation water instead of the deeper, <br />highly saline groundwater. The water would have been more <br />like normal irrigation return flow. Deliveries of this water <br />would have been consistent with the 1944 treaty. which states <br />that "return flow means that portion of diverted water that <br />eventually finds its way back to the source from which it was <br />diverted."25 but Mexico did not consider deliveries of water <br />pumped from wells to be return flows as deflned in the treaty. <br />The Department of the Interior. however. was opposed to re- <br />placing the wells with gravity drains. and Its engineers dis- <br />agreed that gravity drains would reduce the salinity of the <br />drainage waters. <br />If the State Department had been consulted as to the ad- <br />verse effects of the saline waters pumped for the treaty deliver- <br />ies to Mexico before the decision was made for deep well <br />drainage. gravity drains may have been installed initially in- <br />stead of deep wells. The salinity problem might well have been <br />avoided or at least largely mitigated. If the National Environ- <br />