My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC04468
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC04468
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:39:39 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:38:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272
Description
Colorado River - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - CRBSCP
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/1989
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program - Preliminary Findings Report - Uinta Basin Unit - Phase II
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />GC?28E <br /> <br />Concrete lining the 55.5 miles of canals and laterals in the <br />recommended plan to reduce seepage would reduce the salt loading to <br />the Colorado River by an estimated 25,500 tons per year. The reduced <br />canal seepage would also result in a savings of about 16,800 acre-feet <br />of water annually; however, because of its seasonal availability, only <br />about 4,600 acre-feet would be available during the late irrigation <br />season to decrease shortages on presently irrigated land in the unit <br />area. Table 1 lists the total proposed lining, canal capacities, <br />total annual costs, ,average annual salt-load reduction, and <br />cost-effectiveness value for each of the subareas in the recommended <br />plan for phase I. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Description of Phase II <br /> <br />Table 2, taken from the phase II Plan of Study dated September 1986, <br />contains a list of areas and alternative control methods to be <br />considered under phase II. As indicated in the table, review of these <br />items resulted in identification of four areas under the joint <br />Reclamation-Soil Conservation Service (SCS) program and two areas <br />under the Reclamation only program which merit further study. Areas <br />listed under Joint Reclamation-SCS Program were selected based <br />primarily on SCS priorities and recommendations. Areas under <br />Reclamation only were selected based on greatest cost-effectiveness <br />potential. Areas in the Uinta and Upalco Unit areas were not selected <br />due to the relatively low salt loading from the higher bench lands as <br />previously discussed. <br /> <br />JOINT RECLAMATION-USDA PROGRAM <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ute land and Purdy Canals <br /> <br />Improvement of the Uteland and Purdy Canal systems was investigated as <br />a joint project and found to be not cost effective. Estimated annual <br />salt reduction would be 1,180 tons with an estimated annual cost of <br />$164,400, which results in a cost effectiveness of $139 per ton. <br /> <br />The Colorado River Salinity Control Forum Work Group recommended the <br />water users pursue this project on their own. The water users have <br />applied for a loan from the Division of Water Resources and for United <br />States Department of Agriculture onfarm salinity control funds to <br />build this project. The SCS is presently designing both on and <br />off-farm components of this project in coordination with the Division <br />of Water Resources. <br /> <br />Ouray Park Canal <br /> <br />The Ouray Park Canal joint project was found to be not cost effective. <br />Most of the onfarm improvements are already in place; therefore, only <br />the salt reduction achieved by lining or piping 8 miles of canal can <br />be claimed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.