WSPC03144 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1051 Locate nodes representing the aggregated structures within the river network, It is anticipated that nodes representing aggregated irrigation structures will be inserted ~ belo ,75 baseflow nodes, and that 7 additional nodes will be needed to maintain an appropriate level of resolution in simulating irrigation use. The State will on an ongoing basis, advise Boyle on State's preferences for handling special aggregation cases involving subjective or judgement calls, Assign names and ids consistent with established naming conventions to the aggregation nodes and structures, 2. Boyle: using an electronic spreadsheet, import the aggregation lists of WDIDS and acreage and report on any wdids in more than one aggregation group, Provide a summary of 7/1 I WJ?IDs in more ~ one aggregation group, State will resolve by aSsigmng these ids to just)i--. rf#* c::2!!egroup._, ------, ,- -,- --,-,--,-,-- ---,- '-' , -" ,- --" .., -- --- 3, Boyle: Cleanup the Task 3,02 ARCVIEW map to clearly show the aggregations of irrigated lands (and river nodes where their diversions will be represented). Print a 24 by 36 inch copy of the map, 4, Boyle: Prepare a Task Memorandum describing the results of the previous step, The memo should tabulate the structures represented by each aggregation, organized as follows: Group 1 Aggregated structure location: (describe network position) Disaggregated structures: Name and ID Location Structure # Comment ,..etc, Group 2 Agliregated structure location: (describe network position) Disaggregated structures: Name and ID Location Structure # Comment ..,etc, The memo should describe special cases where the grouping required engineering judgement or otherwise did not conform to the criteria listed under Task 3,03.01. A copy of the map produced in Task 3.03.02 should be included, It is expected that the memo will be 3 pages or less in length, excluding the figure and table. 5, Boyle: Make the Task Memorandum available to the State and to the Division Engineer for review. Hold a meeting or telephone call with the Division Engineer to review the aggregation. For budgeting purposes, assume that review will take place in a meeting in Denver, and will be combined with the Division review of Task 3.05.4; if circumstances require a meeting at the Division Office this activity will be considered out of scope. The State CRDSS management team will also provide written comments on the draft task memo and resolve how to handle Task 3.03 review comments from the Division Engineer which conflict with State CRDSS team's comments. The State will complete their review of the memo within one week of receiving the Division Engineer's cOmInents. Boyle will finalizt the subtask memo within a week of receiving the State's COlOJnents, Phase IlIa Scope of Services A-29 June 12, 1996