Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. <br /> <br />C. <br />'I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />RTIWR: Prepare big picture plots of diversions, strearnflows and reservoir contents for two <br />scenarios (phase III historic vs. Phase II historic scenario, and Phase III historic vs, gaged) <br />to be presented at the calibration meeting. <br />RTIWR: Conduct one informal calibr"tion meetiI}g between RTI and the State to identify <br />areas of potential calibration concern, Document the meeting through a set of informal <br />meeting minutes. This scoping document does not account for more than a single review <br />meeting, if additional meetings are required, a change order will be requested, <br />RTIWR: Adjust, in cooperation with the State, the Phase III calibration parameters as a <br />result of the calibration meeting, Calibration parameters for adjustment (to Phase III input <br />files) will include: aggregated node locations, aggregated return flow locations, efficiency <br />of aggregated structures, aggregated demand time series, adjustment to base hydrology, It <br />is noted that adjustments to the Phase II data set may be required, Th" ,iw" dllVl,;dt"d tv <br />make calibration'adjustments-will-nGkxceed-20-ooars, If more than 20 hours are required <br />for the Phase III calibration, a change order will be required for any additional calibration, <br />RTIWR: Produce the final visual comparisons (tables and graphs) for the following <br />scenarios: Phase III historic vs, Phase II historic, Phase III historic vs. gaged, and Phase <br />III calculated vs, gaged, <br />STATE: Prepare a Task Memorandum documenting the calibration process and results, The <br />memorandum will generally describe the differences between the initial model run and the <br />final run. It will not log every interim run or trace the exact procedures followed, The <br />plots created in Task 2.14,05 will be included or referenced by filename in the Task <br />Memorandum. RTI will provide written comments on the memo before State finalization, <br /> <br />Deliverables: <br />I, Statemod simulations for three scenarios, <br />2, Big picture comparison plots between historical and simulated data for two scenarios. <br />3, Scoping meeting documentation, <br />4. Calibrated White River Basin model. <br />5, Graphical comparisons of calibration. <br />6. A memorandum documenting the calibration process and results. <br /> <br />Subtask 2.15 Prepare Baseline Scenario <br /> <br />Objective: Develop a Statemod input data set that represents current conditions, This data set will <br />be available to future users who want to investigate the impact of new water rights or <br />operations on the basin by executing paired Statemod runs representing conditions <br />before and after the contemplated change. <br /> <br />Assumption: A baseline data set for the Phase II model will already be available. This task involves <br />updating those data sets with the aggregated nodes and modifying components of the <br />Phase II model data set which have changed in the course of developing the Phase III <br />model. It is, expected that no new operational or administrative changes will need to <br />be addressed in the White River basin. <br /> <br />Phase III. Scope of Service~ 0 5 8 <br /> <br />A-22 <br /> <br />June 12, 1996 <br />