<br />general, this alternative might be viewed as one in which
<br />the State consolidates the growth that it experienced dur-
<br />ing the first parr of the decade, expanding only minimally
<br />during the test of the petiod.
<br />The medium series shows agriculture increasing at
<br />600 persons per year, mineral extraction increasing by 900
<br />per year, and construction by 1,000 per year. The un-
<br />employment rate is assumed to remain at 3.4 percent
<br />thtough 1978 at which point it will drop down to 3.3
<br />percent. This series is intended to be a moderate forecast
<br />in which the construction industry declines to 75,000 in
<br />1974, and in which the agricultural and mineral extraction
<br />estimates fot 1974 ate those supplied by the Colotado
<br />Division of Employment. The growth in the three in-
<br />dustries amounts to 2,500 jobs per year which is a steady,
<br />if modest, gain. The unemployment rate is estimated to
<br />decline in 1979 in recognition of the fact that under this
<br />alternative the economy of the State is recovering from
<br />the potential slowdown in 1974 and is gtadually moving
<br />ahead.
<br />The high series assumes agriculture will be increasing
<br />by 900 pet yeat beginning in 1974, minetal exttaaion by
<br />1,400 pet yeat, and construction by 3,000 per year. This
<br />series projects that construction will decline to 76,000
<br />in 1974, and that employment that year in the agriculture
<br />and mineral extraction industries will be slightly greater
<br />than those forecast by the Colorado Division of Employ-
<br />ment. In this series there is a substantial annual growth
<br />in mineral extraction in recognition of potential increases
<br />in the energy fields. Agriculture - increases substantially in
<br />recognition of the increased worldwide demand, and con-
<br />struction is increasing at a rate of 3,000 per year. The
<br />unemployment rate declines from 3.5 percent in 1974
<br />to 3.4 percent in 1975, to 3.3 percent in 1976, and finally
<br />to 3.2 percent in 1978, an indication of the increasing
<br />growth of the economy occurring in the latter part of the
<br />decade. The three industries together account for 5,300
<br />jobs per year, which represents a substantial increase on an
<br />annual basis. However, although this is called the high
<br />series, the alternative does not take into account the possi-
<br />bility of sudden, extreme expansion in contract construc-
<br />tion on the order of the tens of thousands of jobs such
<br />as has been observed in the last few years, nor in the po_
<br />tential "explosion" of the mineral extraction industry.
<br />One of the merits of a simulation model is its ability
<br />to explore flexibly alternate paths and changes in altern-
<br />atives as they become of interest. The high series is prob~
<br />ably a reasonable upper limit on growth, excluding sig~
<br />nificanr impacts. However, the possibility of such impacts
<br />cannot be ruled out. and while it would be difficult to
<br />explore all possible time patterns of impacts in the three
<br />specified industries, it nevertheless seems interesting to
<br />examine at least one such impact. Consequently, a sub-
<br />alternative of the high series called the impact series has
<br />been created. This subalternative is identical with the high
<br />series with the following exceptions: there were no
<br />changes made from 1974 to 1977; in 1978 a growth of
<br />10,000 employees in the contract construction industry
<br />(as opposed to 3,000 in the high series) is assumed; and
<br />the unemployment rate in 1978 is assumed to drop to
<br />3.0 percent instead of 3.2 percent in the high series. Con-
<br />
<br />tract construction then is assumed to increase at 3,000
<br />per yeat as before and the unemployment rate in 1979 and
<br />1980 is 3.2 percent as in the high series. No changes were
<br />made to the agriculnue industry or the mineral extraction
<br />industry.
<br />Obviously, many other alternatives could be postu-
<br />lated, such as a new "Vietnam" in the Middle East. Al-
<br />though nOt exhaustive, these alternatives provide a spread
<br />of possibilities for the future. The advantage of a simula-
<br />tion is that if an individual or group desired to explore
<br />the possibility of a sequence of events in which, say, the
<br />mineral extraction industries grew by 10,000 in 1977 and
<br />15,000 in 1978, rhis possibility could be readily examined
<br />with this model. A final note with regard to the selection
<br />of alternatives should be that the choice of alternatives to
<br />be modeled is in part determined by the variables in the
<br />model. For example, an assumed change in the income
<br />structure of the State and any attendant demographic im~
<br />pacts could not be examined within the structure of the
<br />model as it now exists because these concepts are not in-
<br />cluded in it.
<br />The alternate futures developed for the 13 planning
<br />regions were created by allocating employment in the
<br />three specified industries in the State alternatives. The
<br />allocation was based on a shift-share ~ technique which
<br />sought to take into account the likely proportionate changes
<br />in employment for the three industries: agriculture, min-
<br />eral extraction, and contract construction. The regional un-
<br />employment rates were created for each series by sub-
<br />tracting or adding to the annual regional rate the same
<br />increase or decrease that was assumed to occur at the
<br />State level.
<br />
<br />RESULTS OF THE STATE SIMULATIONS
<br />The alternatives described above were simulated for
<br />Colorado using the CPE model on an annual basis for
<br />1970-1980. The data used in all the alternatives was the
<br />same for the years 1970-1973. Population and employment
<br />results from the model ate always as of July 1 of the year
<br />in question. Table 1 shows in capsule form the results of
<br />the simulation.
<br />The alternative future entitled "low" is a somewhat
<br />pessimistic view of events to come. Agriculture grows at
<br />a very slow rate; mineral extraction also at a slow rate;
<br />construction is assumed to drop in 1974 to a low level of
<br />74,000; the unemployment rate will remain at a fairly
<br />high level of 3.4 percent. A population growth of 483,244
<br />is projected for the decade under this series; but over
<br />half is estimated to have ocrurred up through 1973. Cor-
<br />responding to the moderate population growth, employ~
<br />ment has been estimated to grow only 258,394 over the
<br />decade, and mOSt of the growth occurred during the first
<br />three years of the period. The model indicates that under
<br />the assumptions for this series, 1974 would show a net
<br />increase of only 5,000 new jobs over 1973, and the annual
<br />increase would then go up to between 10,000 and 20,000
<br />a year for the rest of the decade.
<br />In the medium series of projections the total growth
<br />in population during the decade is approximately 100,000
<br />greater than in the low series, increasing from 2,224,529 in
<br />1970, to 2,804,467 in 1980. As before, most of the growth
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />0780
<br />
|