<br />occurs from 1970 to 1973. However, there is a sustained
<br />growth during the rest of the decade of approximately
<br />42,000 a year, Employment under this alternative increases
<br />rapidly during the years 1970,1973 (about 55,000 an-
<br />nually), and then increases at a more moderate rate of
<br />approximately 21,000 per year, The total growth in em-
<br />ployment in the decade is 310,449, increasing from
<br />888,600 in 1970, ro 1,199,049 in 1980.
<br />The high series of population and employment pro-
<br />jections indicates a sustained level of population growth
<br />tapering off slightly in the period 1973-1980 from earlier
<br />increases. The model forecasts an average change for the
<br />1970-1973 period of about 95,000 per year and an an-
<br />nual increase in 1973-1980 of about 70,000. The rotal
<br />growth over the decade is 773,951, increasing from
<br />2,224,529 in 1970 ro 2,998,480 in 1980. Employment in
<br />1980 is 1,302,520, representing an increase of about 35,500
<br />annually from 1973. The average growrh over the decade
<br />is 41,000.
<br />The impact series shows a substantial growth in
<br />population in rhe year of the increase (1978). The
<br />change from 1977 to 1978 is 128,043, bur in the high
<br />series the corresponding change is only 70,100, a dif-
<br />ference of about 58,000. In the impact series the change
<br />from 1978 to 1979 is 112,204 and in rhe high series it
<br />is 93,179 for a difference of 19,025. Bur in 1980 the
<br />change from 1979 in the impact series was 75,830, which
<br />is slightly less than the change shown in the high series
<br />of 76,837. Thus, the overall impact of the sudden increase
<br />in employment in construction has been a substantial
<br />growth in the year in which it occurs followed by a rapid
<br />tapering off of that impact. So, the model indicates that
<br />given a sudden impact of increased employment there
<br />would be a corresponding sudden impact in population
<br />which would dissipate itself fairly rapidly. After that
<br />time the model would continue with a larger socia-econom-
<br />ic system, but at roughly the same rate of growth (other
<br />things being equal) that existed prior to this impact. It
<br />should be noted, however, that a series of such impacts
<br />following one upon another would likely have an effect
<br />which is geometric rather than additive, as the pyra-
<br />miding might cause a more rapid growth than would be
<br />expecred by simply adding together such impacts by
<br />themselves.
<br />In the absence of any major impacts, it appears that
<br />the State will go through a stabilization period after the
<br />rather pronounced growth from 1970 to 1973. This petiod
<br />of consolidation should give a respite during which any
<br />problems associated with growth may be examined and
<br />explored so that remedial action can be taken (if neces-
<br />sary). The population in 1980 seems unlikely to be less
<br />than 2,700,000 with an attendant employment of ap-
<br />proximately 1,145,000. And, barring significant events, it
<br />
<br />.~
<br />t ~,~' , ..{)
<br />. r
<br />:'v -.
<br />
<br />Colorado Population Trends is publiShed
<br />quarterly {Winter, Spring, Summer, FalD
<br />by the Business Research Division, Uni-
<br />versity of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
<br />80302. Second-class postage paid at
<br />Boulder, Colorado.
<br />
<br />seems unlikely that the population will exceed 3,000,000
<br />in 1980, with an attendant employment of approximately
<br />1,300,000. In either case, there will be a significant ink
<br />crease in the proportion of the populace aged 65 and
<br />older. The increase in the 25- to 64-year-old age group is
<br />dependent, in part, upon the amount of growth that takes
<br />place during the rest of the decade and the amount of
<br />net employment. related migration which occurs, The size
<br />of the 0-24 age group is also related to the amount of
<br />migration which takes place, but in addition, is related
<br />to the fertility rates which prevail during this period.. Con~
<br />tinued decline in fertility rates could result in further
<br />shrinkage of this age group.
<br />
<br />RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL SIMULATIONS
<br />The results of these simulations are also shown in
<br />Table 1. As a vehicle for discussing the results, it is use.
<br />ful to examine the figures to see if any patterns emerge.
<br />In doing so, it appears rhat Regions 3, 4, 10, and 11 all
<br />have similar characteristics in the estimated patterns of
<br />growth from 1973 onward. In these regions there is a
<br />continued upward trend with a more pronounced up-
<br />swing in Regions 10 and 11 due to the tentatively as-
<br />sumed impact of energy development in those areas. It
<br />should also be noted thar the patterns of growth for Colo-
<br />rado shown earlier are similar to those for these four
<br />regions.
<br />The figures for Regions 2 and 12 show patterns of
<br />growth which represent a tapering off after the changes
<br />which have occurred from 1971 to 1973. Region 2 has
<br />experienced rather remarkable growth during the period
<br />and it appears unlikely that the rate of growth can be
<br />sustained without significant new impacts in that area.
<br />Similarly, Region 12 has also grown substantially from
<br />1971 to 1973 and it appears that a tapering off is quite
<br />likely for this area.
<br />Another group of similar regions is essentially a rural
<br />group composed of Regions 1, 5, 6, 7, and 9. In these
<br />regions the low series of population growth shows es-
<br />sentially a horizontal line from 1973 onward, indicating
<br />a possible zero population growth even though the cor-
<br />responding employment line does continue to trend up-
<br />ward from 1973. In general, these regions exhibit an up-
<br />ward trend for the high series of projections, indicating
<br />that continued growth is certainly still a possibility.
<br />Region 8 is somewhat unique in terms of the esti-
<br />mates prepared by the model. The low series shows a
<br />substantial possible decline in population during the rest
<br />of the decade and even the medium series shows a slight
<br />decline from 1973 levels. The high series showed only
<br />a slight increase from 1973 onward, indicating that per-
<br />haps in this region there may be significant declines in
<br />population. This region's estimates also showed signi-
<br />ficant employment declines on the low series, although
<br />in the medium series the level of employment continued
<br />to rise even though the population appeared to stabilize.
<br />Finally, Region 13 is also somewhat of a maverick
<br />region. The low series for this region shows a slight de~
<br />cline, while the medium series continues an upward trend.
<br />This would be slightly different from the pattern in Re'
<br />gion 8 and different from, of course, the other groups
<br />
<br />4
<br />
|