Laserfiche WebLink
<br />occurs from 1970 to 1973. However, there is a sustained <br />growth during the rest of the decade of approximately <br />42,000 a year, Employment under this alternative increases <br />rapidly during the years 1970,1973 (about 55,000 an- <br />nually), and then increases at a more moderate rate of <br />approximately 21,000 per year, The total growth in em- <br />ployment in the decade is 310,449, increasing from <br />888,600 in 1970, ro 1,199,049 in 1980. <br />The high series of population and employment pro- <br />jections indicates a sustained level of population growth <br />tapering off slightly in the period 1973-1980 from earlier <br />increases. The model forecasts an average change for the <br />1970-1973 period of about 95,000 per year and an an- <br />nual increase in 1973-1980 of about 70,000. The rotal <br />growth over the decade is 773,951, increasing from <br />2,224,529 in 1970 ro 2,998,480 in 1980. Employment in <br />1980 is 1,302,520, representing an increase of about 35,500 <br />annually from 1973. The average growrh over the decade <br />is 41,000. <br />The impact series shows a substantial growth in <br />population in rhe year of the increase (1978). The <br />change from 1977 to 1978 is 128,043, bur in the high <br />series the corresponding change is only 70,100, a dif- <br />ference of about 58,000. In the impact series the change <br />from 1978 to 1979 is 112,204 and in rhe high series it <br />is 93,179 for a difference of 19,025. Bur in 1980 the <br />change from 1979 in the impact series was 75,830, which <br />is slightly less than the change shown in the high series <br />of 76,837. Thus, the overall impact of the sudden increase <br />in employment in construction has been a substantial <br />growth in the year in which it occurs followed by a rapid <br />tapering off of that impact. So, the model indicates that <br />given a sudden impact of increased employment there <br />would be a corresponding sudden impact in population <br />which would dissipate itself fairly rapidly. After that <br />time the model would continue with a larger socia-econom- <br />ic system, but at roughly the same rate of growth (other <br />things being equal) that existed prior to this impact. It <br />should be noted, however, that a series of such impacts <br />following one upon another would likely have an effect <br />which is geometric rather than additive, as the pyra- <br />miding might cause a more rapid growth than would be <br />expecred by simply adding together such impacts by <br />themselves. <br />In the absence of any major impacts, it appears that <br />the State will go through a stabilization period after the <br />rather pronounced growth from 1970 to 1973. This petiod <br />of consolidation should give a respite during which any <br />problems associated with growth may be examined and <br />explored so that remedial action can be taken (if neces- <br />sary). The population in 1980 seems unlikely to be less <br />than 2,700,000 with an attendant employment of ap- <br />proximately 1,145,000. And, barring significant events, it <br /> <br />.~ <br />t ~,~' , ..{) <br />. r <br />:'v -. <br /> <br />Colorado Population Trends is publiShed <br />quarterly {Winter, Spring, Summer, FalD <br />by the Business Research Division, Uni- <br />versity of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado <br />80302. Second-class postage paid at <br />Boulder, Colorado. <br /> <br />seems unlikely that the population will exceed 3,000,000 <br />in 1980, with an attendant employment of approximately <br />1,300,000. In either case, there will be a significant ink <br />crease in the proportion of the populace aged 65 and <br />older. The increase in the 25- to 64-year-old age group is <br />dependent, in part, upon the amount of growth that takes <br />place during the rest of the decade and the amount of <br />net employment. related migration which occurs, The size <br />of the 0-24 age group is also related to the amount of <br />migration which takes place, but in addition, is related <br />to the fertility rates which prevail during this period.. Con~ <br />tinued decline in fertility rates could result in further <br />shrinkage of this age group. <br /> <br />RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL SIMULATIONS <br />The results of these simulations are also shown in <br />Table 1. As a vehicle for discussing the results, it is use. <br />ful to examine the figures to see if any patterns emerge. <br />In doing so, it appears rhat Regions 3, 4, 10, and 11 all <br />have similar characteristics in the estimated patterns of <br />growth from 1973 onward. In these regions there is a <br />continued upward trend with a more pronounced up- <br />swing in Regions 10 and 11 due to the tentatively as- <br />sumed impact of energy development in those areas. It <br />should also be noted thar the patterns of growth for Colo- <br />rado shown earlier are similar to those for these four <br />regions. <br />The figures for Regions 2 and 12 show patterns of <br />growth which represent a tapering off after the changes <br />which have occurred from 1971 to 1973. Region 2 has <br />experienced rather remarkable growth during the period <br />and it appears unlikely that the rate of growth can be <br />sustained without significant new impacts in that area. <br />Similarly, Region 12 has also grown substantially from <br />1971 to 1973 and it appears that a tapering off is quite <br />likely for this area. <br />Another group of similar regions is essentially a rural <br />group composed of Regions 1, 5, 6, 7, and 9. In these <br />regions the low series of population growth shows es- <br />sentially a horizontal line from 1973 onward, indicating <br />a possible zero population growth even though the cor- <br />responding employment line does continue to trend up- <br />ward from 1973. In general, these regions exhibit an up- <br />ward trend for the high series of projections, indicating <br />that continued growth is certainly still a possibility. <br />Region 8 is somewhat unique in terms of the esti- <br />mates prepared by the model. The low series shows a <br />substantial possible decline in population during the rest <br />of the decade and even the medium series shows a slight <br />decline from 1973 levels. The high series showed only <br />a slight increase from 1973 onward, indicating that per- <br />haps in this region there may be significant declines in <br />population. This region's estimates also showed signi- <br />ficant employment declines on the low series, although <br />in the medium series the level of employment continued <br />to rise even though the population appeared to stabilize. <br />Finally, Region 13 is also somewhat of a maverick <br />region. The low series for this region shows a slight de~ <br />cline, while the medium series continues an upward trend. <br />This would be slightly different from the pattern in Re' <br />gion 8 and different from, of course, the other groups <br /> <br />4 <br />