My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02131
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
14000-14999
>
WSPC02131
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:16:56 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:10:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.800
Description
Section D General Studies - Water Resources
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
11/1/1957
Author
USGS
Title
Water Resources Review - November 1957 through December 1958
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10 <br /> <br />nOJ776 <br /> <br />year. A cold snap that accompanied a severe snow- <br />storm during February reduced the infiltration rate <br />and caused the levels to decline to stages that were <br />below average but above those of the preceding yeat'. <br />A thaw during March, however, reversed the trend <br />once again and levels rose. The expected seasonal <br />decline began in May, as the evapotranspiration rate <br />increased, and continued through September 1958, but <br />the levels remained above average during the entire <br />period. During May. water levels in the agricultural <br />area of north-central Connecticut were above average <br />for the first time in 18 months. <br /> <br />The fluctuation of water levels in New Haven gen- <br />erally followed the same trends apparent elsewhere <br />in the state. However, in the cold-storage and indus- <br />trial areas. the effect of variations in the rate of <br />ground-water withdrawn from wells was impressed or. <br />the natural fluctuations. During October and November <br />water levels in these areas rose and were above the <br />seasonal average, whereas levels in the residential <br />area, which are affected ohly slightly by pumping, <br />continued to decline and were below average. In <br />December. levels throughout the New Haven area rose <br />and continued to rise through May. By January. levels <br />in the residential area were above average for the <br />first time during the water year. In the cold-storage <br />and industriaL areas they reached record-high stages <br />for each successive month from March to May. The <br />levels declined from June through September in the <br />New Haven area. but remained above average and <br />above those of the preceding year. <br /> <br />New York.-During the early part of the water year, <br />water levels in Upstate New York generally were near <br />or below average. Water levels in some wells began <br />to rise seasonally in October and all wells had begun <br />to rise seasonally by December when above-average <br />precipitation and temperature resulted in increased <br />recharge. The rate of recovery began to diminish in <br />late December or early January and water levels re- <br />mained relatively unchanged until a general thaw in <br />March resulted in a further rise in levels. As a re- <br />sult of the March rise, water levels were near or <br />above average in most areas at the beginning of the <br />growing season. Water levels began to decline <br />seasonally in most observation wells in April. Heavy <br />precipitation in July and August resulted in a rise in <br />the water level in some wells a~d a reduction in the <br />rate of decline in others. In general, water levels <br />were near or above average during the last few months <br />of the water year. <br /> <br />On Long Island, ground-water levels during the year <br />were considerably higher than those of the previous <br />year and in some wells record-high stages were ob- <br />served. This high position can be attributed to the <br />abundant rainfall during the late winter. spring and <br />summer months of 1958. Beginning in January 1958, <br />each succeeding month had above-normal precipitation <br />until by the end of August 1958 the accumulated de- <br />parture was about 10 inches above normal. <br /> <br />In Kings County the upward trend of water levels, <br />which had prevailed in the Flatbush area since the <br />termination of pumping in 1947 by the New York Water <br />Service Corporation," apparently continued into 1958. <br /> <br />In Queens County. the levels generally rose during <br />the year. The most marked change was in the <br /> <br />south-central part of the county where water levels in <br />several wells. which have declined continously since <br />1953 and were record-low during th,e 1957 water yea!', <br />rose substantially abovp those levels recorded in 1957. <br />This was due in part to a slight decrease of pumpage <br />in this area and in part to the abundant rain.fall. <br />Pumpage by the City of New York from installations <br />along the south shore of the island in Queens and <br />Nassau Counties wa::i not significant during the year. <br /> <br />In the western third of Nassau County, water levels <br />rose substantially from record-low stages observed <br />early in the water year. Ground water in this part of <br />Nassau County is heavily pumped both for industrial <br />and dome.stic purposes. In the center of this area a- <br />long the Queens County line the water levels are also <br />greatly influenced by the heavy pumpage in south. <br />central Queens County. In other parts of Nassau <br />County water levels in wells generally rose during the <br />year. The pressure head in some artesian wells a- <br />long the north shore of Nassau County was record <br />high. <br /> <br />In Suffolk County the draft from wells is only <br />moderate and large parts of the tounty are relatively <br />undeveloped. For this reason the fluctuations of <br />ground-water levels are more related to rainfall than <br />to pumping. Water levels rose markedly during the <br />year in the county. and many reached record-high <br />stages. <br /> <br />New Jersey.--Ground-water levels were below <br />average throughout most of the State during the months <br />of October and November 1957. and record-low stages <br />were observed in many wells tapping the hard-rock <br />formations. the unconsolidated glacial sands and <br />gravels, and the unconsolidated deposits of the Atlantic <br />Coastal Plain. These record-low stages can be attri- <br />buted to an unusually dry spell from May through <br />November 1957. During the month of December 1957, <br />sufficient precipitation fell to reverse the trend. and <br />since then the levels have been gradually rising. At <br />the end of September 1958, the water levels were <br />about average. <br /> <br />Pennsylvania.-Most ground-water levels rose <br />seasonally during the first part of the year and reached <br />their highest stages in the month of April. From May <br />through August the levels generally declined as <br />evapotranspiration losses increased. The levels be- <br />gan to rise again in September when evapotranspiratio,tl <br />losses decreased. <br /> <br />The levels generally were higher during 1958 than <br />during 1957, except in January and February when the <br />levels in many wells were lower. New record-high <br />levels were establf.shed at several wells in Chester <br />and Delaware Counties. <br /> <br />Delaware.-Ground-water levels in shallow water- <br />table wells rose steadily during the first 7 months of <br />the water year in response to above-normal precipi- <br />tation and seasonal trends. Heavy rainfall occurring <br />from December through April resulted in record-high <br />water levels in April. at which time they were, on the <br />average, more than 4. feet higher than at the beginning <br />of the year, The water levels declined slowly through- <br />out the remaining five months of the year and at the <br />end of the year were about 1 t ft above the average <br />water level of the preceding 7 years of record. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.