My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02131
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
14000-14999
>
WSPC02131
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:16:56 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:10:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.800
Description
Section D General Studies - Water Resources
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
11/1/1957
Author
USGS
Title
Water Resources Review - November 1957 through December 1958
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />O;JG7'75 <br /> <br />GROUND WATER IN UNITED STATES <br /> <br />Maine.-At the beginning of the year the water levels <br />in ~ation wells were well below average and the <br />October level in the key well at Cornish was the lowest <br />of 15 years of record. In northern Maine water levels <br />began to rise during the latter part of October and by <br />early November they were above average. Elsewhere <br />in the State. the sea'sonal summer decline, which was <br />accentuat~d by near-drought conditions, continued into <br />November. In some localities water levels did not <br />begin to rise until around the middle of November as <br />no precipitation of note fell until late October or early <br />November. By December, however, the water levels <br />in all observation wells were at or above average. <br />New December highs were reached in wells at Portage~ <br />Sherman Mills, and Mercer as a result of heavy pre- <br />cipitation and abnormally high temperatures which <br />melted the snow and caused the frost to melt, and~ <br />thus, perIIlitted recharge to occur. The water level <br />remained at a record"high stage during January at <br />Mercer and rose to a new January high at Amherst. <br />At Sherman Mills and Portage, however, the water <br />levels in January declined and were slightly below <br />average at the end of the month. At Sherman Mills <br />the level remained below average during the rest of <br />the y~ar except during March and April when it rose <br />to above-average stages in response to snowmelt and <br />precipitation. At Portage the level also rose during <br />March but remained well above average during the <br />remainder of the year, reaching a new record-high for <br />August and then declining rapidly during September. <br />The water levels in the wells at Amherst and Mercer <br />remained high from December through the end of the <br />year, and record-high levels for May and June were <br />reached at Mercer and for August at Amherst. At <br />Cornish, the level in the key well in January equalled <br />the previous record"-high stage for that month. It <br />remained above average until the end of May when it <br />was just slightly below average. It generally declined <br />during the rest of the year, and was below average <br />during June, slightly above average during July as a <br />result of heavy rains, and below average for August <br />and September. At the end of the year water levels at <br />Cornish and Sherman Mills were below average but at <br />Portage, Mercer, and Amherst, they were above <br />average. At the end of the year water levels in aU <br />obs'ervation wells were higher than last year. <br /> <br />New Hampshire.-Water levels in observation wells <br />in southeastern New Ham.pshire declined in October <br />and during most of November owing to a deficiency of <br />precipitation in the preceding months. The lowest <br />levels for the period of record (about 4! years) were <br />measured at the end of October; at the end of November <br />the water levels were the lowest on record for that <br />month and a new record-low level was measured in <br />the ob~ervation well at HaInpton. Water levels began <br />to rise near the end of November, and rose steeply in <br />December, but were still below average. The rise <br />continued in January and at the end of the month the <br />water levels were the highest of record. The levels <br />remained well above average through March but de- <br />clined from April through September and were below <br />average at the end of the year. <br /> <br />The' water level in the observation well at New <br />London, in central New Hampshire, rose only slightly <br />in October~ but rose steeply during November and was <br />considerably above average at the end of November <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />owing to above average precipitation during October <br />and November. The level remained above average <br />through the end of July, but was below average in <br />August and September. The December and April levels <br />Here the highest on record (10 years) for those months. <br />Thick. snow cover prevented measurement. of the water <br />level in January and February. <br /> <br />Massachusetts.--Ground-water levels in Massachu.. <br />setts were well below average at the beginning of the <br />water year owing to a deficiency of precipitation in thp. <br />preceding summer and late spring. Water levels rose <br />seasonally in most observation wells during November <br />but remained below average. Recharge from exces- <br />sive rainfall in December, however, raised the water <br />levels in most wells above average for December. <br />Water levels continued to rise from January to April <br />and record-high levels for January and March were <br />reached in several wells. Although water levels began <br />. to decline seasonally in May and continued to decline <br />during the summer months, they were at or above <br />average at the end of each month during the remainder <br />of the water year. The water level in the key well at <br />Great Barrington 1'0 westem Massachusetts, at the end <br />of October and November equalled the lowest level of <br />record which had been set at the end of September <br />1957. Record-low levels for December, January~ and <br />February were measured in this well also.. The water <br />level in the key well at Leominster in central <br />Massachusetts was record low for October. At the <br />end of the year levels in all observation wells in <br />Massachusetts except at Great Barrington were above <br />average. The water level in the Great Barrington <br />well~ remainep below average throughout the year but <br />was higher at the end of the year than at the beginning. <br /> <br />Rhode Island.-Ground-water levels in October and <br />November were well below average, owing to record- <br />low precipitation during the previous water year, but <br />rose to well-above-average stages in 'December and <br />January as the result of above-normal precipitation. <br />Ground-wate:r levels declined slightly in February <br />when precipitation was deficient but then rose through- <br />out the remainder of the year as the result of above- <br />normal ,precipitation from April through September. <br />Thus by the end of the 1958 water year, all observation <br />wells had recovered from the drought of the 1957 <br />water year, and water levels were much higher than <br />average. <br /> <br />Connecticut.-Ground-water levels in observation <br />wells in Connecticut rose considerably during the 1958 <br />water year and at the end of the year generally were <br />above average. <br /> <br />The levels were depressed markedly at the beginning <br />of the water year, owing to the drought of 1957. Rain- <br />fall continued deficient through October and November, <br />and water levels declined to stages much below <br />average. At several wells, levels were the lowest or <br />near lowest of record for these two months, and at a <br />few wells levels were the lowest of the entire period <br />of record. An upward trend began in some areas <br />during November and became general in December as <br />heavy rain was received during the latter month. <br />Additional heavy precipitation during January contin- <br />ued to drive water levels upward anq. by the end of the <br />month had erased the effects of the 1957 drought in <br />nearly all partgl of the State" End-of-January levels <br />were above average and above those of the preceding <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.