My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02131
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
14000-14999
>
WSPC02131
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:16:56 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:10:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.800
Description
Section D General Studies - Water Resources
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
11/1/1957
Author
USGS
Title
Water Resources Review - November 1957 through December 1958
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />flll J 7 7'1 <br /> <br />As a result of extended above-normal precipitation, <br />springs in the Piedmont region of northern Dalaware <br />discharged record flows of 8 to 21 gpm from January <br />to July. <br /> <br />Water levels in the artesian aquifers of the non- <br />marine Cretaceous sediments of northern Delaware <br />rose slightly, even though industrial pumpage was in- <br />creased for the 3rd consecutive year. The net decline <br />of water level in some observation wells for the 3-year <br />period was mQre than 40 ft. Rises in water levels in <br />these aquifers may not be significant, however, because <br />of variations in daily and wee-kly pumping and the <br />irregular intervals between measurements. <br /> <br />Maryland.-In the Baltimore industrial area water <br />levels fluctuated in the same manner as in previous <br />years~ according to changes in pumpage in the val'i.ous <br />districts of the area. In general~ no pronounced trends <br />were evident, except in the Highlandtown-Dundalk <br />districts where the levels generally rose. <br /> <br />In both the Appalachian and Piedmont Provinces, the <br />water levels in some wells reached record-low stages <br />early in the water year after a very severe drought <br />during the summer of 1957. In the spring of 1958, how- <br />ever~ the levels in many wells were at or near record... <br />high stages as a result of above-normal precipitation. <br /> <br />In the western part of the Coastal Plain, the drought <br />of the summer of 1957 resulted in a number of record- <br />low levels at the beginning of ' the water year. With <br />above-average rain"all in the spring and early summer <br />of 1958, water levels in many wells rose to average or <br />above-average stages. One artesian well near Glen <br />Burnie in Anne Arundel County and another near <br />Piscataway in Prince Georges County continued to de- <br />cline because of pumpage of ground water by the <br />Washington Suburban and Anne Arundel County Sanitary <br />Commissions. <br /> <br />On the Eastern Shore, fluctuations in water-table <br />wells followed the same general pattern as elsewhere~ <br />reflecting chiefly seasonal variations in precipitation. <br />The levels in the artesian wells tapping, the Piney <br />Point formation in the Cambridge area~ however, con'" <br />tinued to decline as a result of sustained withdrawals <br />from the aquifer. Water levels in this aquifer have <br />been declining slowly but persistently in the Cambridge <br />area for several decades. <br /> <br />West Virginia.-Ground-water levels, which were be- <br />low average at the beginning of the year~ rose slowly <br />during the winter months and more rapidly during the <br />spring when precipitation was above average. During <br />the summer, the levels were maintained by continued <br />above-average precipitation. At the end of the year, <br />the levels in the northern part of the State were from <br />1 to 3 it above average and elsewhere were at or <br />slightly above average. <br /> <br />North Carolina.--Ground~water levels throughout the <br />State generally rose during the past year, owing to <br />above-average precipitation. Distribution of rainfall <br />over broad areas was irregular and resulted in rising <br />water levels in some areas and declining water levels <br />in others. There is no indication that excessive with- <br />drawals of water have resulted in the lowering of water <br />levels in anyone section of the State. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />Rising water levels were most pronounced in the <br />Piedmont Province. In May and June the levels in the <br />key well at Chapel Hill were record-high for those <br />months, more than three ft above the twenty-two-year <br />averages for these dates. The level in the key well at <br />Murphy, in the Mountain Province, was slightly above <br />average for nine months of the year. Most wells in <br />the Coastal Plain were above average for all or most <br />of the past twelve months, however, in September, the <br />level in the key well at Maysville was record-low for <br />that month and was 5.6 ft. lower than it was a year ago. <br /> <br />South Carolina.-Ground-water levels throughout the <br />State generally were considerably higher than last year, <br />owing principally to the excess qdnfall received during <br />the fall of 1957 and spring of 1958. Rainfall during the <br />1958 water year was more than 12 inches above normal. <br /> <br />In central South Carolina many water levels in <br />artesian aquifers were the highest since 1953. and in <br />1 well the level was the highest since 1952. The levels <br />in the water-table aquifers also rose sharply. This rise <br />started in the beginning of the 1958 water year and con- <br />tinued through July 1958. The rainfall for August and <br />September was slightly below normal and the ground- <br />water levels also declined slightly. The levels in 2 <br />water-table wells were the highest since 1951. <br /> <br />In northeastern and southern South Carolina the <br />ground-water levels in general rose in the first half of <br />the watez; year owing to above-normal precipitation <br />but declined gradually from May through the end of the <br />year. Despite this decline the levels were above aver- <br />age at the end of the water year. <br /> <br />Georgia.-The decline of water levels in the principa.1 <br />artesian aquifer in the Savannah area was interrupted <br />by a slight seasonal rise during the winter and spring <br />owing to a decrease in pumpage and to recharge of the <br />aquifer during a wet spring. Water levels resumed <br />their downward trend later in the year and by the end <br />of September were at a record-low stage in many wells. <br /> <br />In the Albany area water levets in the Ocala lime- <br />stone at the end of the year were well above the levels <br />of the previous year. This rise in water levels is <br />attributed to heavy rainfall in the winter and spring <br />months. Water levels in the Clayton formation at the <br />end of the year were slightly below the levels of the <br />preceding year. The decline in water levels was due <br />to deficient rainfall in late summer and early fall and <br />an increase in pumpage by the city of Albany in mid- <br />July. <br /> <br />The water levels in the shallow and deep wells in <br />north Georgia declined through the first part of the <br />year but rose during the latter part, principally be- <br />cause of heavy rainfall in July. At the end of the year <br />the levels generally were slightly higher than at the <br />beginning. <br /> <br />Florida.--Ground-water levels in central and northern <br />Florida generally continued the upward trend that <br />started in the spring of 1957. The rises were caused, <br />in the main, by above-normal precipitation over the <br />greater part of the State. <br /> <br />Water levels in central Florida roughly corresponded <br />to those recorded in the key well in Marion County. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.