Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />1 . 00333'~ <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Economic and Financial Ana1vsis <br />. <br /> <br />Annual Project Benefits <br /> <br />!i:!!pr salvage. All Naters which Nil1 be salvaged can <br />be beneficially used as described in CHAPTER VII - POTENTIAL USES <br />OF SALVAGED WATER of the .Ju1y 1963 Feasibility Report. The Closed <br />Basin Division of the San Luis Valley project is, estimated to <br />salvage 100,800 acre-feet of water annually from stages 1 through <br />5. Part of the salvaged water amounting to 5,300 acre-feet <br />annually Nou1d be supplied to the Alamosa 1~i1d1ife Refug() and <br />the rel~aining 95,500 acre- feet would be used to reduce the debi t <br />of Colorado under the terms of the Rio Grande Compact. <br /> <br />Anaiyses of water use and cro!, returns on the Rio Grande <br />project in Texas and Ne\1 /Iexico, ~lidd1e Rio Grande project in <br />Ne\1 ~Iexico, and San Luis Vallcy project in Colorado established <br />that the net farm income per acre- foot of water de Ii vcred to the <br />San Luis Valley project Nou1d be less than the comparable values <br />for the NC'1 Hexico and Texas projects primarily because of the <br />shorter grOll1ng season whi ch prevails in the San Luis Valley. <br />It 11as therefore concluded that benefits based on use of the <br />salvaged Naters on the Rio Grande Division lands of the San Luis <br />Valley project would furnish a conservative minimal appraisal of <br />the Imter salvage benefits assignable to the plan of development. <br /> <br />Farm income and costs Jor the Rio'Grande Division lands wcre <br />estimated on the basis of six farm budgets which evaluate the <br />effects of land sizcs and classes and agricultural enterprises <br />prevai ling in the Rio Grande Division. On the basis of these <br />budgets, the average annual bencH t assignable to the 224,340 acres <br />of existing 'irrigation in the Rio Grande Division l11th a full water <br />supply 11as estimated to be $59 per acre. The diversion reqdrement <br />to furnish a full water supply was computed to be 2.23 acre-feet per <br />acre. - On this basis, the benefits assignable to salvaged 'vater' <br />delivered to the Rio Grande was estimated to average $26.46 per <br />acre- foot, or $2,527,000, for the estimated average annual <br />95,500 acre-feet of salva!led water. After adjustment for s:tage <br />construction, this \10uld be $1,843,000 annually, of which $1,074,000 <br />would represent primary benefi ts and. $769,000 secondary bcnefi ts. <br /> <br />Area redevelopment. Several Colorado counties adjoining <br />or wi thin commuting distance of the Closed Basin Division, San Luis <br />Valley project, are designated depressed areas in accordance wi th <br />the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, Public La\1 <br />89-136. These counties include Conejos, Costilla, Archuleta, and <br />Saguache. Construction and operation and maintenance costs of the <br />project \10uld provide employme~t opportunities for unemployed \Iorkers <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />,. <br />