My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00886
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC00886
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:07:58 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:24:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.111
Description
Colorado River Basin-Water Projects-Central Utah Participating Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/22/1988
Author
Ival Goslin
Title
Central Utah Project-Ceiling Increase Legislation-Comments on HR 3408 and S 1737
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- 12 - <br /> <br />CRSP. They should be in separate legislation after <br />long-standing negotiations among the Department of the <br />Interior, the Ute Tribe, and Utah settle a number of <br />issues involving water for Indian lands, etc. <br /> <br />Section 19 (h) directs the National Academy of Sciences <br />and the U.S. Comptroller General to conduct a very compre- <br />hensive study of the storage, hydroelectric generating and <br />distribution facilities, and Colorado River operations. <br /> <br />(1) Obviously this is an effort to spend <br />many millions of dollars on an Upper Basin-wide EIS <br />on operations of the river in order to justify changes <br />in the purposes and operation of the CRSP dams and <br />reservoirs. <br /> <br />(2) The amount of money and its source for <br />such a study does not seem to be specified but it prob- <br />ably would involve many millions of dollars from the <br />excess revenues of the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. <br />The parameters for such a study as this should emanate <br />from negotiations and agreement of all four Upper Basin <br />States. <br /> <br />Section 20 would affect project construction in all four <br />of the Upper Basin States because it would require that <br />appropriations for construction and mitigation of fish and <br />wildlife values be made concurrently according to a schedule <br />that would be written by an unknown entity in a report to <br />accompany H.R. 3408. <br /> <br />2258 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.