Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 13 - <br /> <br />1. This procedure would be in direct opposi- <br />tion with standard Bureau of Reclamation practice of <br />building mitigation features at the most opportune and <br />economic time during project construction. <br /> <br />2. This procedure would undoubtedly lead to <br />poor management of Federal appropriations. <br /> <br />3. It would probably adversely affect the <br />future appropriations for Colorado projects; such as <br />the Animas-LaPlata and Dolores projects. <br /> <br />Section 21 would make available to the Central Utah <br />Project Mitigation and Conservation Commission $15,000,000 <br />of the Basin Fund revenues for compensation to the Strawberry <br />Valley Project Association for surface rights and interests in <br />56,775 acres of lands to be added to the Uinta National Forest. <br /> <br />1. CRSP revenues should not be used for such <br />a newly concocted and questionable purpose unrelated to <br />the CRSP. <br /> <br />2. The Strawberry Valley Project <br />part of the Colorado River Storage Project. <br />involving such project should be in separate <br /> <br />is not a <br />All actions <br />legislation. <br /> <br />2257 <br />