My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00749
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC00749
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:06:51 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:20:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8541
Description
San Luis Valley Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
1/1/3000
Author
Unknown
Title
San Luis Valley Project Closed Basin Drain - 1966-1969 - Preliminary Evaluation of Restoration of Channels of the Rio Grande and its tributaries in the San Luis Valley of Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />.. . ~...., <br />~,~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Conservation Board and. the Bureau of <br />Reclamation have jointly made a preliminary evaluation of the eco~ <br />nomic feasibility of restoring ~he channels of the Rio Grande and <br />its,tributaries in Colorado 0 This evaluation consisted of deriving <br />, preliminary estimates of construction costs for restoring the stream <br />channels; estimating-the annual operation, maintenance, and. replace- <br />ment costs; estimating the potential savings of water and the basin- <br />wide benefits resulting therefrom; deriving preliminary benefit-cost <br />ratios; and. determining the expenditures required for more detailed <br />studies of feasibility grade investigations 0 <br /> <br />No detailed field investigations have been made. The pre- <br />liminary evaluation of construction costs is based upon an aerial <br />reconnaissance, the judgment of engineers of the Colorado Water Con- <br />servation Bpard and the Bureau of Reclamation who are familiar w~th <br />the area, and upon readi4' available 'hydrologic and. topographic data. <br />In restoring the channels of the main'river and "tributaries, the <br />present riverbed elevations would be retained to conform with the <br />'elevation requirements of the present irrigation systems. The river <br />channels would not be deepened because they could then act as major <br />drains, thus disturbing the hydrologic balance of the practice of <br />subirrigation in the Valley 0 The channel restoration works would <br />not be designed for flood protection purposes because major flood <br />control in the San Luis Valley can be economically achieved through <br />operation of the existing and. potential reservoirso The annual <br />operation, maintenance, and replacement costs have been estimated <br />from the costs experienced in maintaining the Rio Grande channel <br />in the Middle Rio Grande Valley, with appropriate adjustments for <br />differences in sedimentation and. vegetative conditions in New Mexico <br />and Coloradoo The reduction in water losses that would result <br />from channel restoration was estimated from the results of past <br />investigations of rates of evapotranspiration in the, San Luis <br />Valley and extensive studies of reducing water losses in the Rio <br />Grande Basin above Fort Quitmano The value of water savings to the <br />basin was kept conservative4' 11.ow at $60 per acre-foot 0 This is an <br />average value of water for irrigation in the Upper Rio Grande Basin <br />derived in other Bureau of Reclamation economic studies. <br /> <br />The San Luis Valley is an area of major importance for <br />recreation, fishing, production of ducks, and the maintenance of both <br />large and small bird and mammal lifeo Any required mitigation mea- <br />sures for fish and wildlife purposes, as well as benefits from <br />enhancement of fish and wildlife and recreation purposes, were <br />recognized but not studied in this preliminary evaluation. In <br />future, more detailed studies, the purposes of channel restoration, <br />prevention of water loss, fish and wildlife mitigation and enhance- <br />ment, and recreation enhancement would be combined to attain optimum <br />development for all purposeso <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.