Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />, <br />, ' <br />, , <br />I <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,~' " ".' ~\'1; ~ <br />"~ ..~~;, ~:\.. _ S: <br /> <br />SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, COLORADO <br /> <br />PRELIMINARY EVALIlAfiON OF RESTORATION OF CHANNELS OF <br />THE RIO GRANDE AND ITS TRIBUTARIES IN THE SAN LUIS <br />VALLEY OF COLORADO <br /> <br />Irrigation in the San Luis Valley was begun in the ear~ <br />1850's, but it was not until about, 1880 that extensive development <br />occurred. Then in the decade 1880~90, accelerated activity resulted <br />in most of the large canal systems and otber irrigation works tbat <br />exist today. This development great~ cbanged tbe regimen of flows <br />of tbe Rio Grande and its tributaries. During tbe past eigbt decades, <br />the cbannel of tbe Rio Grande, in adjusting to the smaller residual <br />flows, bas general~ deteriorated into a braided, ill-defined water <br />course. The same phenomena has also occurred, to a somewhat lesser <br />extent, to tbe channels ,of tbe Conejos and San Antonio Rivers. The <br />channels of the smaller tributaries, La Jara, AlamOsa, and Rock Creeks <br />have been similar~ affected by reduced flows and farming and ranching <br />practices. <br /> <br /> <br />The limited water supp~ of the Rio Grande is used and <br />reused so many times that essential~ no flow from the Upper Rio <br />Grande Basin escapes past Fort Quitman, Texas. The limited supp~ <br />is allocated to international use by the United States and the <br />Republic of Mexico under the terms of 'the Convention of 1906. The <br />residual United States supply is further allocated among the States <br />of Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas by the Rio Grande Compact. The <br />State of ColoradO has been attempting to make its Rio Grande Compact <br />deliveries to the downstream States on a dai~ basis. The trans- <br />mission of the larger flows throug~the present deteriorated channels <br />of restricted capacity has resulted in large overflows throughout the <br />flood plains of the Rio Grande, the Conejos River and the San Antonio <br />River with the resultant high, nonbeneficial transmission losses. <br />The overflow in the Rio Grande flood plain has also restricted the <br />discharge of the smaller tributaries and drains, causing additional <br />overflow and loss of water. Such diminution of the meager water <br />supply is not a local problem as it adverse~ ,affects all of the <br />water users in the Upper Rio Grande Basin. The problem of channel <br />deterioration is not unique to the Colorado portion of the Rio Grande <br />Basin. It has been a stead~~ developing problem throUghout the <br />Upper Rio Grande Basin which has occurred more slow~ in Colorado <br />because of different hydrologic and ecologic conditions and the light <br />sediment loads transported by the headwater flows. It has been nec- <br />essary to restore extensive reaches of the Rio Grande channel. Such <br />work was accomplished from Fort-Quitman upstream to Caballo Dam by <br />the International Boundary and Water Commission. In the Middle Rio <br />Grande Valley, the Rio Grande has been channelized northward 'from <br />the Narrows of Elephant Butte Reservoir to the mouth of White Rock <br />Canyon some 50 miles above Albuquerque. This work was accomplished <br />by the cooperative efforts of the Bureau of Reclamation, the Corps <br />of Engineers, the State of New Mexico, and the Middle Rio Grande Con- <br />servancy District. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />