Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Two others have records of continuing diligence and presumably will <br /> <br />be perfected. <br /> <br />We are of the opinion that al I of the remaining conditional rights <br /> <br />are sufficiently old that they can be considered as having been <br /> <br />abandoned for practical purposes. Of the five rights considered <br /> <br />presently valid the White Lakes Reservoir Ditch and the W & 0 Spring <br /> <br /> <br />are decreed for essentially non-consumptive ~ses and would have no <br /> <br />effect upon the Rangely Project. The remaining three small viable <br /> <br />rights total 6.89 cfs of direct diversions for irrigation use. <br /> <br />Operation of these sma I I senior rights would result in estimated <br /> <br />'additional diversions from the upper White River of about 165 AF <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />per year on the average with an attendant reduction in yield of the <br /> <br />Rangely Project of perhaps 70 AF per year. <br /> <br />In summary, operation of all of the senior rights decribed above <br /> <br />which were not operated in th~ Rangely Project computer simulation <br /> <br />studies, could reduce the yield of the Rangely Project by an <br /> <br />estimated average amount per year as shown in Table 2. <br /> <br />0246 <br /> <br />- 13 - <br /> <br />t. I" <br />""-~'~ <br />