|
<br />.
<br />
<br />Adjustments will be made to the model with the objective of improving agreement betWeen the Phase
<br />III historical scenario and gaged data. The comparison between Phase IIIa historical output and Phase
<br />II historical output provides perspective on how well modeled and observed data can be expected to
<br />match: if the Phase IIIa changes do not significantly alter Phase II calibrated results, the Phase IIIa
<br />model is deemed acceptable, When the model has been calibrated, the Phase IIIa calculated demand
<br />scenario will be compared to gaged data and the differences will be documented.
<br />
<br />~PP~~0:; linplel;l~nt the eni;~~eme~t~~d~~t~fied ;dmutua~Y-'a,~reed UP2~ ig Task 3,13~
<br />2, Boyle: For both the historical and calculated'dati, execute StatcMod in the check mode. Review
<br />the check table output C*xtb) for anomalies (loosing hydrology reaches, reasonable return patterns,
<br />etc,)
<br />3. Boyle: For both the historical and calculated data, execute StatcMod in the report mode for stream
<br />and diversion comparison, Review the stream comparison outQut C*xsc) for ability to reproduce
<br />gaged streanlflows, and the diversion comparison output C*xdc) for ability to reproduce historic
<br />iiversions,~ I' '" I. P' I~....~ouk] A /.4-
<br />4. Boyle: For both the historical and calculated data, execute StatcMod in the report mode for
<br />reservoir comparison. Review the reservoir comparison output C* .xrc) for ability to reproduce
<br />reservoir end-of-m~nth records. C_ , _._ r I II BUltS,
<br />. ,
<br />5, Boyle: For both the historical and calculated data, execute StatcMod in the report mode for
<br />diversion shortages. Review the diversion shortage output C* .xsh) fpr ability to reproduce gaged
<br />diversions, Compare to Phase II results.
<br />6, Boyle: For both the historical and calculated data, generate plots for the structures presented in the
<br />Phase II report usin the tern latesdeve19ped in Task 3.13.
<br />. oy e:' eet with the'State ana brief them on the histonc yamp -, ca 1 ra Ion 'reSUlts. I-hls
<br />- .
<br />meeting will be a ~half-day work session during which the State can examine results. If the
<br />calibration is determined to be satisfactory, review the calculated CyampaC) calibration results. If /
<br />the State determines the calibration is unsatisfactory, no 'additional activities will be performed
<br />which are beyond the anlount budgeted in this Task unless mutually agreed upon as a contingency
<br />activity.
<br />Boyle: Produce ~s for the structures presented in the Phase II report, Note this includes,
<br />graphs for both the historic and calculated data sets,
<br />Boyle: Prepare Task Memorandum 3.14 documenting the calibration nr~cess and results in a
<br />format similar to that prepared for the White River Basin (November 19, 1996). The memorandum
<br />will generally describe the differences between the initial model run and the final run, It will not
<br />log every interim run or trace the exact procedures followed, The plots created in Task 3,14 will be
<br />included or referenced by filename in the Task Memoramtum, The State will review a draft of the
<br />memo and provide written comments within two weeks of receiving the draft, Boyle will finalize
<br />/-;) the memo within two weeks of receiving the State's comments,
<br />&' 10, Boyle: As appropriate, revise Task Memorandum developed previously to reflect enhancements
<br />associated with the calibration.
<br />
<br />.'
<br />
<br />-?7 8,
<br />?9,
<br />
<br />'. Deliverables:
<br />1, Boyle: Calibration adjustments to StateMod input files,
<br />2, Boyle: Interim graphs and tables to be presented at the midpoint briefing session,
<br />
<br />Phase IlIa Scope of Services
<br />
<br />11~Q;1, 1997
<br />
<br />A.34
<br />
<br />\
<br />,
<br />
<br />
<br />,;}f
<br />}/
<br />
<br />
<br />!'
<br />~_.
<br />
<br />2-
<br />
<br />fj,
<br />../
<br />1 :it>
<br />c;~
<br />
|