My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153604 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
C153604 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2009 9:26:17 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:25:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153604
Contractor Name
Julesburg Irrigation District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
64
County
Logan
Bill Number
SB 86-27
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Supplemental fields
Water Division
1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Seepage from saturated portions of the embankment discharging Into the outlet conduits <br />can cause a condition known as piping, whereby fine grained soils from the dam embankment are <br />transported from the fill, creating a void which allows greater flows and, subsequently, more soil <br />loss, This condition can ultimately lead to a partial or complete failure of the embankment. It is our <br />opinion that over the years a seepage path has developed along the embankment interface at the <br />top of the conduit, and is evidenced by extensive seepage from cracks within the conduit and at <br />the downstream headwall structure, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Monitoring and observation holes drilled into the Dam No.4 embankment adjacent to the <br />outlet conduit have revealed a lens of sand and gravel in the embankment fill which is contributing <br />to the seepage evident at the downstream toe area of the dam. Because of the potential for piping, <br />we believe the sand and gravel layer, which may have been placed as backfill for the outlet conduit, <br />could pose a serious threat to the long-term integrity of the dam, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Without the rehabilitation of the outlet works, the concrete in the conduit will continue to <br />deteriorate and seepage flows can be expected to increase along with the accompanying increase <br />in piping of the embankment materials, The structure faces an increasing probability of catastrophic <br />failure or severe reservoir storage restriction by the State Engineer. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Geotechnical Invest illation <br />Extensive geotechnicaf'investigations have been performed with respect to major structural <br />rehabilitation of the Julesburg Dam Nos, 2 and 3. The investigations included exploratory test holes <br />in the embankment fills and foundation materials; soil sampling and classification; laboratory testing <br />including shear tests, grain size analyses and triaxial tests; installation of piezometers; and stability <br />analyses. The rehabilitation of the two dams consisted of installation of toe drains and a filter <br />blanket, stabilized by the placement of an earth-fill berm along the toe of the dams. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Geotechnical reports were prepared for Dam Nos, 2 and 3 by Chen and Asso<::iates, which <br />describe the investigations and analyses performed and the results obtained. The various <br />geotechnical reports are dated August 3, 1978; September 11, 1986; October 21, 1986; August 27, <br />1987; November 20, 1987; and April 4, 1988. Based upon the recommendations of the reports, the <br />repair measures were designed by Chen and Wheeler, reviewed and approved by the State <br />Engineer's Office, and constructed, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.