Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />,"",", . <br />~~. . <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />\ <br />f <br />\ <br /> <br />~~~ <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />.......... -..... ......... ......-...'-' <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br /> <br />~ Richard felt that any money paid ahead of time by stockholders <br />could be broken down for future assessments and would be their part <br />of the project. <br /> <br />. , <br />1: Leroy Schlagel also asked if it would be possibl e 1'or the <br />Water District to loan money to the Ditch Co. since ehey have such <br />a large interest in the Ditch CO. <br /> <br />Forrest Cook, the Ditch Co. felt there cn1l1d be sOllie problelllS <br />presented with borrowing money trom the Water District. <br /> <br />tamara Nauman asked if assessments could be set differently <br />for the stockholders who pay ah~ad of time. <br /> <br />Richard answered thA cost of the project and PQyment of the <br />project would have to be set ditferently from future assessments. <br /> <br />" question by Susan Kinney Tolhurst: Since the county <br />approved the housing development around L~e Valley, why shoulun't <br />they have to be responsible for some of the cost? <br /> <br />Richard suggested that stockholders <br />le9;~lator informing them of th~ situation. <br />any good, but wouldn't hurt. <br /> <br />ELECTION OF DIRECTOR FOR DISTRICT 3: Charles Lippincott is <br />r.urrently the Direotor for Dist~ict 3. <br /> <br />write their state <br />It prubQ~ly won't do <br /> <br />MOTION: sy Lee For3yth to nominate Chdl;ll:l1S Lippincot:t: tor Director <br />of District J. <br />Second by Leroy Schl~gel. <br />MOTION CA.~IEO. <br /> <br />MOTION: By Leroy Schlagel to el~ct Charles Lippincott Director of <br />Disl.r.i.ct 3. <br />Second by Harold Steele. <br />MOTION CARRIEIJ. <br /> <br />The Board or the Ditch Co. would like to recommend a maximum <br />of 3 AP of water per share for the year 1994. Any amount used over <br />the 3 AF maximum would have a $5.00 per AF charge at the end of the <br />year. The reason for this recommendation is to try to stop the <br />abuse ot Iree water. <br /> <br />Joe Andrews felt that the Ditch Board was trying to solve a <br />individual ditch prOblem, but is punishinq the whnle syste=. Don <br />Getlllan agreed with Mr. Andrews. . <br /> <br />Richard Behrmann reiterated that the Board just wants to stop <br />the waste of free water, but it has t.o be equal for all <br />stockholders. He also mentioned that this is not a money-getter <br />for the Ditch Co. There are onlY a fAW abusers in thQ system, but <br />those abusers need to be curtailed, <br />