Laserfiche WebLink
<br />V-7 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />narrative so the heights and storage are not <br />known. A separate water treatment plant was <br />included in his costs. <br /> <br />The advantages are t~at costs will be shared <br />with irrigators and the dam is located at a <br />higher elevation so it could serve more of the <br />rural service area. A major disadvantage is <br />the high cost. with inflation and new <br />environmental restrictions, it is probable that <br />the cost for the reservoir would be double that <br />shown on the Mesa Engineering estimate. A <br />second disadvantage is that it would probably <br />take 10 years to getjapprovals for a new <br />reservoir at this site. Also, since the <br />Reservoir will be shared with irrigators, <br />Norwood may encounter the same problems they <br />have now. <br /> <br />Feasibilitv. For the above reasons, the dam on Ed- <br />Joe Draw will no longer be considered in detail. <br /> <br />5. Alternative 5 - Pump statton and Pipeline for San <br />Miauel River Water. <br /> <br />Discussion. Under this option a pump station will <br />be placed on the San Miguel River, southeast of <br />Norwood at the mouth of Beaver Creek. The San <br />Miguel River flows through a deep canyon at this <br />point. Elevation at the pump station is about 66S0 <br />feet. A pipeline would be extended up the west bank <br />of the Beaver Creek valle~ and then up the east <br />canyon wall to a point just south of the Cornfourth <br />gravel pit at elevation 7660 feet. The static lift <br />would be 980 feet. With head loss, the pump would <br />have to pump against a head of over 450 psi. In <br />addition, construction of the pipeline on the very <br />steep slopes along the east canyon wall of Beaver <br />Creek would be relatively expensive. In order to <br />assure reliable access to the pump station, either a <br />bridge on the San Miguel River or an access road for <br />2 miles on its south bank is needed. <br /> <br />Feasibilitv. According to the Division Engineer, <br />there is presently available water year around in <br />the San Miguel River. However, it is probable that <br />this system would be expensive to build and operate, <br />particularly as the primary system. The existing <br />Gurley system presently provides adequate low cost <br />water during the warm weather months. The San <br />Miguel could possible provide a reliable, high <br />quality source of water in winter; therefore, a cost <br />estimate will be made to determine its economic <br />feasibility as a winter supply. <br />