Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />likely rendered it in very poor condition. A new <br />pipeline would also be required from the Reservoir <br />to Norwood-Wrights Mesa facilities, a distance of <br />nearly 2 1/2 miles. <br /> <br />The main advantage is that some facilities are in <br />place and Cone Water is generally of higher quality. <br />The disadvantages are: <br /> <br />- The Town would have <br />Reservoir Company. <br />apparently does not <br /> <br />to buy shares of Lone Cone <br />Cone Reservoir Company <br />have excess water. <br /> <br />- The city Reservoir would require extensive <br />rehabilitation work. It is silted in, and new <br />pipes would be required. <br /> <br />- A considerable investment would be required for <br />new pipelines to connect to the rest of the <br />system. <br /> <br />Feasibilitv. It is unlikely that this system will <br />be cost-effective or feasible. Perhaps the best <br />argument for deleting it from further evaluation is <br />that it was abandoned by the Town beforehand when it <br />was functioning. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Alternative 4 = Dam and Reservoir in Ed-Joe Draw. <br /> <br />Discussion. Ed-Joe Draw is a drainage located south <br />and east of the Town of Norwood. Its upper basin is <br />at an elevation of about 8300 ft. The reservoir <br />would be located entirely on Forest Service land. <br />Two different plans have been suggested for the dam <br />and reservoir on Ed-Joe Draw. These are: <br /> <br />a. Charlie Heldman has developed a sketch for a <br />dam 245 ft. high with a surface area of 254 <br />acre feet. The amount of storage is not know. <br /> <br />b. Mesa Engineering did a cost estimate for a dam <br />and reservoir as part of their April 1975 <br />feasibility study. The dam they suggested in <br />the report narrative would be 85 feet high and <br />would have storage of 1350 acre feet. The Town <br />would utilize 350 acre feet and Cone Reservoir <br />Co. would utilize 1000 acre feet. The <br />expected runoff capacity would be 1250 acre <br />feet per year. The Town would have to file on <br />350 acre feet of excess water. The report <br />presented two costs: a high dam would cost 1.39 <br />million dollars and the low dam would cost 1.25 <br />million dollars. It did not differentiate <br />between the low dam and the high dam in the <br /> <br />V-6 <br />