My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00540
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00540
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:22:24 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:00:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153697
Contractor Name
Norwood, Town of and Norwood Water Commission
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
60
County
San Miguel
Bill Number
FSL
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />V-5 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3) An open field just west of the Norwood water <br />treatment plant <br /> <br />Feasibilitv. Each of the. 3 sites has its own <br />advantages and disadvantages. Each reservoir would <br />be supplied by existing w~ter rights out of Gurley <br />Reservoir, which would eliminate the need to acquire <br />new rights (other than th9se previously mentioned) . <br />The reservoirs can be built in reasonably close <br />proximity to the existing, source of supply and other <br />existing infrastructure which would eliminate the <br />need for long pipelines, canals and pumping <br />stations. The fact that the reservoirs are <br />relatively small reduces ~he environmental and <br />construction problems asspciated with combined <br />irrigation municipal syst~ms. Experience with other <br />reservoirs on the site indicate that there may be <br />construction problems (prlmarily due to the presence <br />of Dakota sandstone). However, this problem can be <br />reduced with judicious selection of sites. Land <br />will have to be purchased for each site. However, <br />since this is a rural area, there are relatively <br />large parcels and generally, it will be necessary to <br />deal with only one landowner. The reservoir will be <br />dedicated to municipal us~ only; since this water is <br />of higher value and can be sold to customers at <br />higher costs, the repayment process is simplified <br />(as compared to irrigatioh water) . <br /> <br />There are no obvious obstacles to any site; however, <br />it is probable that an in~depth analysis will prove <br />one to be more cost effective than others. <br />Therefore, this alternative will be investigated in <br />more detail. . <br /> <br />3. Alternative 3 - Lone Cone/Old citv Reservoir svstem. <br /> <br />Discussion. This alternative would revive the Old <br />City Reservoir system. Old City Reservoir is an <br />abandoned reservoir located about 3 1/2 miles <br />directly south of the west side of Norwood. The <br />reservoir is on 17 1/2 ac~es of Town land at an <br />approximate elevation of 7720 feet. The original <br />municipal water system utilized the reservoir for <br />storage. Norwood previou~ly owned shares in the <br />Lone Cone Irrigation comp~ny, and supplied the <br />reservoir with Lone Cone water. Since the darn is <br />less than 10 feet high and is an off-stream <br />reservoir, it is non-jurisdictional. The potential <br />storage area is very shallow, and apparently has <br />silted in considerable. Volume capacity is unknown. <br /> <br />Ditch condition between Cone Ditch and the reservoir <br />is unknown; however, disuse for many years has <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.