My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00540
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00540
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:22:24 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:00:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153697
Contractor Name
Norwood, Town of and Norwood Water Commission
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
60
County
San Miguel
Bill Number
FSL
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />to include the rural areas, the Town of Norwood and <br />the San Miguel Water Conservancy District signed an <br />Agreement to jointly own and administer the newly <br />expanded water system. According to the agreement, <br />dated May 20, 1977, the new water system was to be <br />operated and maintained jointly by the Town and <br />District through an entity known as the Norwood-San <br />Miguel Joint Water commission. The Commission was <br />to consist of three members of the Board of Trustees <br />of the Town of Norwood and three water users <br />appointed by the San Miguel Water conservancy <br />District (the District). The Town and the District <br />each provided a specified amount of assets for the <br />combined water system. <br /> <br />The Joint commission was to have no treasury. The <br />Town was to act as billing agent and was to bill the <br />District for costs of Joint Venture Facilities. <br /> <br />To handle administration of the rural pipeline, the <br />District established a committee know as Wrights <br />Mesa Rural Water System Board. The Board <br />represented the District on the various water <br />matters which are its responsibility, but was not a <br />legal entity. However, the term Wrights Mesa Board <br />was frequently used in conjunction with activities <br />that are the legal responsibility of the District. <br /> <br />There were several problems with the Joint Venture <br />agreement including: <br /> <br />1. Exact ownership of facilities was not well <br />defined. <br /> <br />2. Official status of the Wrights Mesa Rural <br />Water System Board (which represents the <br />District) was uncertain. <br /> <br />3. The Town Board and Wrights Mesa Board <br />frequently worked separately. <br /> <br />4. Cost share of new facilities was not well <br />defined. <br /> <br />2. Town of Norwood Water Commission. <br /> <br />To eliminate the administrative problems caused by <br />the Joint venture, it was decided to have one entity <br />own and operate the system. On December 23, 1993, <br />the Town of Norwood Water Commission was created. <br />The Town absorbed Town ownership (from SMWCD) of all <br />the water system infrastructure. It is responsible <br />for all assets, debts, finances, and operations. It <br /> <br />11-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.