Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Plan 0-1 <br /> <br />This plan assumed upgrading (replacement) of the existing gravity system. <br /> <br />Plan 0-2 <br /> <br />This plan provided for a new diversion dam (located just north of the treatment <br />plant), sand trap, raw water pumping station, and pipelines. <br /> <br />Plan 0-3 and Plan 0-4 <br /> <br />These plans involved two new diversion locations, with raw water <br />pumps, similar in concept to Plan 0-2, except using different dam <br />locations. <br /> <br />WRC concluded that Plan 0-2 was preferable to 0-1 and either 0-3 or 0-4. This conclusion was <br />questioned by the Town of Morrison; and a reevaluation specifically required as part of the current <br />Master Plan effort. <br /> <br />A detailed comparative evaluation of two plans was undertaken and included in the MWE 1996 <br />Master Plan. Please refer to Section III, pages 5 through 15 of the appended Report. Option B-2 <br />in the Master Plan is essentially the same as 0-2, The probable initial capital investment for the <br />gravity flow plan (Option B-1) was shown to be less than for B-2, Further, the comparative annual <br />costs for Option B-1 was shown to be less for two size levels, as shown in Table III-C ofthe Master <br />Plan. ($47,400/yr for B-1 at the lower load level versus $64,250/yr for B-2 - or 35% higher costs <br />for Option B-2.) The following table summarizes cost comparisons for the two plans. <br /> <br />Comoarative Caoital Cost <br />Without dam replacement <br />Assuming dam replacement <br /> <br />Option B-1 <br />$360,000 <br />$510,000 <br /> <br />Option B-2 <br />$545,000 <br />$515,000 <br /> <br />Comoarative Annual Cost <br />1000 EQR level <br /> <br />$47,400 <br /> <br />$68,950 <br /> <br />The principle reason for the difference of opinion is the assessment of the usability of the 12- <br />inch cast iron pipe transmission line. WRC assumed that the entire line (stated to be 4,300 <br />linear feet) would have to be replaced, at a total estimated cost of approximately $320,000, In <br />actuality, the problems and concerns regarding the transmission line are primarily with the much <br />older, upper 800-foot segment which had not been replaced in 1961 - and with the masonry <br />settling basins. Field checks and research by MWE indicated that the 12-inch cast iron pipe portion <br />is still in relatively good useable condition - and need not be replaced in the foreseeable future, <br />If the cost of replacing this line is deducted from the WRC estimate, then using WRC estimates, <br />Alternative 0-1 (Le" Option B-1) results in lower capital cost. With anticipated reasonable <br /> <br />70-080.039P:REPORT <br /> <br />II-3 <br />