My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00406
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:24 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:53:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0004X
Contractor Name
Green Mountain Exchange Project CWRDA
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Grand
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />---' <br /> <br />- ...--.- ~--,_____ ~ _-...- ___ __ _. ~_~ __._ ,__._ 04___ .__ .___. _.____....________.______ ___ _"___ _ .______. _...- ---- -,- ------..-------- <br /> <br />1, Expanded Operation of Existina Svstems <br />o CST/Windy Gap Project (Adams Tunnel) <br />o Fryingpan-Arkansas Project (Boustead Tunnel) <br />o Fraser River Diversion System (Moffat Tunnel) <br />o Slue River Diversion Project (Roberts Tunnel) <br />o Homestake Project (Homestake Tunnel) <br />o Green Mountain Reservoir Water Sales Program <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />2, <br /> <br />New Facilities not Presentlv in Existence <br />o Williams Fork Collection System Extension (Gumlick Tunnel) <br />o Straight Creek Diversion (Roberts Tunnel) <br />o Two Forks Reservoir (1.1 million af storage) <br /> <br />'-' <br /> <br />'-' <br /> <br />Table 3.1 contains a comparison of the average levels of annual diversions for the major <br />transmountain diversion systems as historically recorded and as operated in the Existing-Level Use <br />Scenario with increased demands by those systems listed above, Green Mountain Reservoir Water <br />Sales Program, which is not included in Table 3.1, is assumed in this Study to supply water ranging <br />from 12,500 af/yr to 22,800 af/yr with an average of approximately 16,000 af/yr (RCI, 1985), <br /> <br />'-' <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />--' <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />I <br />L <br /> <br />3-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.