Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(- <br /> <br />(e <br /> <br />g. The need for comparing alterntives for other features <br />may become evident and'will be consIdered in the course <br />of the study by arriving at the tentative selected <br />arrangement for the project. <br /> <br />Task 11 - Railroad and Other Facility R~locations <br /> <br />a. Studying the relocation of the railroad shall be given a <br />high priority in this study due to the large percentage <br />of the total cost of the project which it represents. <br />In analyzing the railroad relocation, the Contractor <br />shall : <br /> <br />(1) Meet with representatives of the Denver and Rio <br />Grande-Western Railroad, obtain operational <br />constraints which would be placed on any <br />relocation, and develop basic design criteria for <br />relocation. <br /> <br />(2) Perform site inspection/evaluation as noted in <br />Tasks 4 and 5. <br /> <br />(3) Review in close detail plans of ongoing constructon <br />of 1-70 and determine the basis of potential <br />multiple use of highway corridor for railroad <br />relocation. <br /> <br />(4) Identify all potential conflicts and interfaces <br />with existing transportation facilities and other <br />improvements. <br /> <br />(5) Evaluate the relative cost of a large cut or tunnel <br />for relocation near DeBeque. <br /> <br />(6) Establish a preliminary corridor location. <br /> <br />(7) Perform an alignment Inspection and readjust where <br />approprIate. <br /> <br />(8) Prepare a cost estImate based on experIence cost <br />data, and consultation with the Denver and Rio <br />Grande-Western Railroad and others. <br /> <br />b. Relocation of an existing transmission line, and a <br />wastewater treatment plant and other facilitIes, if any, <br />will be studied. Respective owners of these facilitIes <br />will be consulted on the preferred manner and location <br />of any revisions required. Cost estimates of these <br />relocations will be from experience data with similar <br />installations and will be compared to the potential loss <br />of water yield and output with a lower reservoIr. <br /> <br />~11- <br />