Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Company's repairs have generally been successful in maintaining the integrity of the <br />embankment and facing materials. <br /> <br />Additional Desion Issues <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Additional design issues include the potential wave runup height on the dam <br />slope. Differing repair options provide varying degrees of wave resistance to runup. <br />For instance, a 10 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) beaching slope dissipates the wave energy <br />over a long flat reach, and the maximum wave runup is approximately 1/3 that of the <br />same wave against a concrete slab placed at, a 1. 6 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) slope. A <br />key factor in evaluating the wave runup is the wind fetch length and maximum wind <br />velocity. Wind fetch was evaluated using the SCS T.R. 69 method, and wave runup <br />calculations were determined using both ACER T.M. No 2 and the SCS methods. Table <br />7 provides a summary of the results obtained at Jackson Lake Reservoir, assuming an <br />83 miles per hour design wind velocity, and varying slope protection surfaces and slope <br />angles. These calculations are presented in Appendix E. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The size and thickness of a rock riprap blanket for slope protection was also <br />determined using the SCS method. These calculations indicate that a median rock size <br />of about 24-inches and a minimum rock layer thickness of 36-inches would be required. <br />These calculations are also presented in Appendix E. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />23 <br />