My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150063 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
C150063 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:03:42 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:50:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150063
Contractor Name
Jackson Lake Reservoir & Irrigation Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
1
County
Morgan
Bill Number
SB 94-29
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Company's repairs have generally been successful in maintaining the integrity of the <br />embankment and facing materials. <br /> <br />Additional Desion Issues <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Additional design issues include the potential wave runup height on the dam <br />slope. Differing repair options provide varying degrees of wave resistance to runup. <br />For instance, a 10 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) beaching slope dissipates the wave energy <br />over a long flat reach, and the maximum wave runup is approximately 1/3 that of the <br />same wave against a concrete slab placed at, a 1. 6 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) slope. A <br />key factor in evaluating the wave runup is the wind fetch length and maximum wind <br />velocity. Wind fetch was evaluated using the SCS T.R. 69 method, and wave runup <br />calculations were determined using both ACER T.M. No 2 and the SCS methods. Table <br />7 provides a summary of the results obtained at Jackson Lake Reservoir, assuming an <br />83 miles per hour design wind velocity, and varying slope protection surfaces and slope <br />angles. These calculations are presented in Appendix E. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The size and thickness of a rock riprap blanket for slope protection was also <br />determined using the SCS method. These calculations indicate that a median rock size <br />of about 24-inches and a minimum rock layer thickness of 36-inches would be required. <br />These calculations are also presented in Appendix E. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.