Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />.1 <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />6 - ESTIMATED COSTS OF IMPROVEHENTS <br /> <br />6.1 GENERAL COST INFORMATION <br /> <br />Due to the extreme fluctuation in the national economy during the past few years~ <br />the estimation of construction costs for some future period is an extremely diffi- <br />cult task. Construction costs depend on several complex variables such as: labor <br />rates, materials prices, equipment and raw materials costs, mobilization and <br />overhead costs, and the complexity, type, and quantity of the work. The quantity <br />of total construction work available in the area and the time of year when a project <br />is offered for bids have a direct impact on the number of responsible bidders and <br />their respective bid amounts. With these variables in mind it should always be <br />remembered' that a cost "estimate" is not a rigid and firm cost. It represents the <br />estimator's best judgment of prices and conditions prevailing at the time of the <br />estimate and projecting these prices and conditions to a future date for con- <br />struction. <br /> <br />Construction costs are developed from a combination of current labor and materials <br />costs, materials,quotations, an analysis of recent project awards, and cost pre- <br />dictions for the Colorado Springs area from the "1976 Dodge Guide for Estimating <br />Pub~ic Works Con!3truction Costs." .., The tabulation of costs has been escalated to <br />reflect 1977 prices. <br /> <br />An overall construction contingency of approximately 9.4% is included in the cost <br />estimate. This amounts to a 10% contingency on distribution mains, 5% contingency <br />on the storage facilities, and approximately 12%' contingency on the well houses <br />and water treatment facilities. <br /> <br />Construction cost indexes published by various private and governmental agencies have <br />increased at an average rate of 4% annually from 1954 to about 1967. The annual <br />rate of increase changed drastically in the period 1967 through 1972, reaching an <br />average rate of plus 9% annually with quarterly rates as high as plus 12-13%. <br />The annual rate of increase has been somewhat moderated and suppressed during <br />the past four years, first by partial federal wage and price controls and then by <br />a'generally depressed national economy. Inflation is expected to continue throughout <br />the 1970's, and cost escalations for future construction are estimated to be <br />6% compounded annually through 1981, then 4% compounded annually throughout the <br />design period. Escalation multipliers are shown below through a 20-year period <br />(1976-1995). ., <br /> <br /> Escalation Escalation Escalation Escalation <br />Year Multiplier Year Multiplier Year Multiplier Year Multiplier <br />1976 1.00 1981 1.338 1986 1. 628 1991 1. 981 <br />1977 1.06 1982 1.392 1987 1.693 1992 2.060 <br />1978 1.124 1983 1. 447 1988 1. 761 1993 2.143 <br />1979 1.191 1984 1. 505 1989 1. 831 1994 2.228 <br />1980' 1. 262 1985 1. 566 1990 1. 905 1995 2.317 <br />Other costs included in the Summary of Estimated Project Costs are: land and <br />rights-ofway acquisition, interest during construction, engineering fees, inspection. <br />fees, administrative and legal costs, and fiscal costs for bonding or loan program. <br />These costs for Stage I construction are estimated as follows: <br /> <br />-33- <br />