Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CHAPTER VII: PROJECT EVALUATION <br /> <br />A. General. <br />This project is proposed to rehabilitate the two dams at <br />North Poudre Reservoir No. 2 which is an existing water storage <br />reservoir owned by The North Poudre Irrigation Company. The water <br />from this facility is used for irrigation of crop and pasture <br />land. <br /> <br />The rehabilitation of Reservoir No. 2 will allow North Poudre <br />to continue to supply water to its downstream shareholders. <br />Approximately 3,400 acres of land is presently being irrigated <br />from water stored and distributed through Reservoir No.2. <br /> <br />The reservoir is currently under a hold order at a Gage <br />Height of 18.0 feet which provides for a storage capacity of 2378 <br />acre-feet. Rehabilitation of the dam will allow North Poudre to <br />store a total of 3910 acre-feet of water for an increase of 1532 <br />acre-feet. Without rehabilitation, it is very possible the dam <br />will have further restrictions placed on it or that a partial <br />failure of the East Dam may occur which would jeopardize the <br />ability of North Poudre to continually supply water to the <br />downstream users. Without rehabilitation, it is expected that <br />within five (5) years to ten (10) years the dam will experience <br />greatly reduced capacities either due to an outlet failure or <br />increased restriction by the State Engineer. <br /> <br />Various options and alternatives have been studied to <br />determine the feasible alternatives available and the costs <br />associated with each. The following analysis is an attempt to <br />look at the costs and benefits of each to provide The North Poudre <br />Irrigation Company a basis for determining the best alternative to <br />fit their needs and budget. <br /> <br />To provide an economic analysis of the various options the <br />economic life of the various alternatives had to be determined and <br />the economic value of the water right determined. The economic <br />life as defined in Enqineerinq Economv by Thueseu, Fabrycky, and <br />Thuesen, 1977, 5th Edition is as follows: "The economic life is <br />also referred to as the minimum cost life or the optimum replace- <br />ment interval". We have chosen to estimate the economic life <br />based on the optimum replacement interval which we based on <br />engineering judgement and on the economic life used in Handbook of <br />Dam Enqineerinq by Alfred R. Golze, 1977. From this we consider <br />the dam and reservoir to have an economic life of at least 75 <br />years if a complete rehabilitation of the dam is completed. <br />However, because of the project loan period being 40 years, that <br />will be used in the following economic analyses. <br /> <br />For the economic value of the water right we have based that <br />cost on the market value of water and its projected value. Water <br />for replacement of water to the cities of Loveland and Fort <br />Collins is currently selling for $600 to $1000 per acre-foot. This <br />same water was selling for in excess of $2000 per acre-foot in the <br /> <br />VII-l <br />