Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CHAPTER VII <br /> <br />MISSOURI HEIGHTS ENLARGEMENT PLAN <br /> <br />Estimated Costs <br /> <br />Construction costs <br /> <br />Construction costs of the Missouri Heights Reservoir enlargement <br />plan are estimated at $4,536,000 on the basis of reconnaissance design <br />data and January 1973 prices. The Bureau of Reclamation made the esti- <br />mates for all features, with the exception of those for recreational fa- <br />cilities which were made by the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. The esti- <br />mates are shown below. <br /> <br />Project features <br />Missouri Heights Reservoir enlargement <br />Landis Canal <br />Permanent operating facilities <br />Recreational facilities <br />Total <br /> <br />Estimated <br />cost <br />$3,550,000 <br />945,000 <br />30,000 <br />11,000 <br />4,536,000 <br /> <br />Operation, maintenance, and replacement costs <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Project operation, maintenance, and replacement costs have been es- <br />timated at $14,500 annually on the basis of 1970-72 prices. Approximately <br />$11,000 of this amount would be required for reclamation facilities and <br />the remaining $3,500 for recreational facilities. <br /> <br />An emergency reserve fund of $15,000 would be established by the Ba- <br />salt Water Conservancy District to defray unusual operating expenses. <br /> <br />Development Pro~ram <br /> <br />Development of the Missouri Heights Reservoir plan would require a <br />period of approximately 5 years following authorization. This would in- <br />clude 2 years for advance planning work and 3 years for construction. <br /> <br />Benefit-cost Analysis <br /> <br />Benefits <br /> <br />Irrigation <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Benefits from irrigation are estimated at $51,000 annually, includ- <br />ing $41,900 in direct benefits and $9,100 in indirect and public benefits. <br />The benefits were estimated by the farm budget method of analysis as dis- <br />cussed in Chapter III. Adjustments were made in the benefits to reflect <br />the gradual shift of the project developed water supply from irrigation <br />to outdoor residential use over the period of analysis. <br /> <br />58 <br />