Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I.' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~4- <br /> <br />Phase I <br /> <br />Task 1 - Because the Sheriff Dam and Reservoir are <br />classified as high hazard, the SEO requires that the reservoir <br />have a spillway capable of safely passing the probable maximum <br />flood (PMF) resulting from the probable maximum precipitation <br />(PMP) in the catchment above the dam. The engineering analy- <br />sis methods used to determine the PMF for a given catchment <br />are sensitive to assumptions made concerning the basin charac- <br />teristics. Hence, spillway modification requirements for <br />Sheriff Reservoir will be sensitive to basin characteristics <br />used in the hydrologic evaluations. The previously completed <br />COE Phase I Inspection Report i~cluded hydrologic evaluations <br />which were based on analysis methods outlined in the U.S. <br />Bureau of Reclamation's "Design of Small Dams" (DSD). Based <br />on our preliminary review of the Phase I Inspection Report, it <br />is our opinion that the study did not consider several impor- <br />tant factors related to the catchment above the reservoir, <br />including: <br /> <br />1. Heavy basin vegetation, <br /> <br />2. Geologic and other site conditions affecting runoff, <br />and <br /> <br />3. Actual records of basin runoff. <br /> <br />We will consider these factors in our analyses. Because these <br />factors were not considered in the early study of the COE, we <br />believe that the work completed under this task could result <br />in a reduction in the required pMF magnitude. These factors <br />are discussed in greater detail in a subsequent section of this <br />proposal. <br /> <br />Conversely, it should be noted that a recently released <br />state-of-the-art rainfall document for Colorado, HMR-49, <br />published by the National Weather Service, was not available <br />at the time of the 1980 study. Based on DSD and HMR-49 docu- <br />ments, the rainfall intensities and temporal storm distribu- <br />tions may be different. The information contained in HMR-49 <br />will likely outline higher total PMP rainfall values for use <br />in determining PMF flows. It will be important to include the <br />new HMR-49 information in our evaluations, in order to satisfy <br />current SEO mandates. <br /> <br />Task 2 - The reservoir is located on property managed by <br />the White River National Forest. The Forest Service property <br />extends approximately 6 miles downstream and privately owned <br />properties do not begin until downstream of that point. <br />Design regulations promulgated by the SEO allow owners of dams <br />to perform "Incremental Damage Assessments" to evaluate incre- <br />mental downstream effects of the failure of a dam. Provided <br />