My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00156
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00156
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:02:52 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:40:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153721
Contractor Name
Lyons, Town of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
5
County
Boulder
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />System Demands <br /> <br />System demands are expressed as statistics for estimated average day usage and peak <br />day usage for the existing demand and future demand. See Table 3 for water production data. <br />The town estimates the population served at 1350, as previously stated. Data provided by the <br />town on analysis of metered and unmetered customers for 1993 was also reviewed. As a <br />result, the following are the statistics used in this report: <br /> <br />Gross capita annual average demand = 227 gal/cap/day (all usage) <br />Number of Single family equivalent tap (SFE) = <br />125 metered residential <br />+ 303 unmetered residential <br />+ 104 (commercial, schools, town, leakage, other) <br />= 532 existing SFE taps to the system. <br />Capita per SFE = 2.5 (1350 cap/532 SFE = 2.5, reasonable) <br />Peaking factor = max day/avg day = 4.0 (1990 data shows 3.99) <br /> <br />Using the above data, (227 gal x 532 SFE x 2.5 cap/SFE x 4.0 pf)/106 = 1.2 MGD. This <br />result represents the total maximum demand condition to be placed on the existing system; it <br />compares well with the 1.234 MGD observed in 1990 (Table 3) and is used throughout this <br />study to evaluate the adequacy of the town's water system. <br /> <br />Water System Model and Results of Analysis <br /> <br />To analyze the existing water system, RED developed a computer model of the system <br />using the CyberNet Version 2.16 analysis package. Components such as pipelines, pipe <br />junctions (called "nodes"), valves, supplies, demands and storage tanks are input into the <br />model. The nodes are usually distribution points, such as fire hydrants or taps, or points of <br />demand on the distribution system. <br /> <br />Existing system mapping data supplied by the town was entered into the model to construct the <br />storage and distribution system network. The existing pipe diameters range from 2 inches to <br />12 inches. The resulting network is a close approximation of the existing system. Because the <br />majority of the existing piping system was old and may have tuberculation, i.e., internal <br />deposits obstructing flow, a coefficient of roughness, or C factor, of 90 was assumed in the <br />model for the existing system piping. Newer pipe is typically represented by a C factor of <br />140. These C values are used in calculating the friction losses within the piping system. A <br />pipe with a C factor of 90 will typically have approximately twice the friction loss as a pipe <br />with a C factor of 140. <br /> <br />Once the preliminary computer analysis was performed for fire flows, the resulting results <br />were compared against measured fire flows at various hydrants throughout the system. The <br /> <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.