Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />roughness factor was than adjusted to calibrate the model. It was found that the older pipes in <br />the system (approximately 50 years old) required that the roughness factor be reduced to 60. <br />this indicated that the older portion of the existing system has sever tuberculation. <br /> <br />Results of the computer analysis are as follows: <br /> <br />l.The existing system currently has the ability to meet maximum daily flows. <br /> <br />a.Pressures <br />(1) Upper pressure zone - 63 psi to 128 psi <br />(2) Lower pressure zone - 43 psi to 100 psi <br /> <br />2.Fire flows <br />a. A fire flow of 1000 g.p.m. (as directed by the town) + maximum day demand was <br />used at a residual pressure of 20 psi at the hydrant. <br />b. The 0.35 MG in-town storage tank was turned off in model, because a fire might <br />occur when the tank was not operating. <br />c.Significant problems with fire flows are apparent. <br /> <br />(1) Large portions of the upper zone can not meet the required 1000 g.p.m.. In <br />the northeast part of town at the highest hydrant, maximum available fire flow <br />available is 657 g.p.m. in Longs Peak Drive (fire hydrant elevation 5535) with <br />a residual pressure of 20 psL This low flow is most notably due to the losses in <br />the six and 8 inch pipes. It is probable that there are actually negative pressures <br />in the higher portions of the zone under fire demand conditions. <br /> <br />(2) The lower zone has large areas where the maximum fire flow is less than the <br />required 1000 g.p.m.. The deficiency occurs primarily in the older parts of <br />town. The minimum available fire flow was 232 g.p.m. located on Ewald <br />A venue. these low flows are due to the small diameter of pipes (typically 4 <br />inches or less) and the age of the system (high tuberculation). <br /> <br />Refer to Figure 6 which shows the apparent problem areas. In summary, results suggest that <br />while the existing system is capable of delivering at least 40 psi throughout most of the system <br />during the peak hour demand, it was found that sufficient fire flows could not be maintained at <br />all hydrants in the system. Specifically, in the upper pressure zone not all of the fire hydrants <br />are able to deliver the required fire flows at the required pressure. This is due in part to the <br />single feed to this zone and the six inch pipes within the system. <br /> <br />Additionally, head loss tends to be a problem in water distribution systems when pipe <br />diameters of less than six inches are used. In particular, small diameter pipes incur excessive <br />head loss rates when carrying fire flows. One way to treat this problem is to "loop" water <br />lines in a system. By constructing or modifying a system to be composed of several <br /> <br />33 <br />