Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />.; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3. Formulation of Alternatives. <br /> <br />4. Evaluation of Alternatives. <br /> <br />5. Presentation of the Interim Phase II Report. <br /> <br />6. Presentation of Final Phase II Report. <br /> <br />These steps are described in the rem9inder of this section. <br /> <br />2.1 EVALUATION OF CBr SYSTEM CONST~INrS <br /> <br />In Phase I, estimates of the magnitude of vater supply surplus or deficit <br />conditions vere based on hydrologic factors and vater rights constraints. <br />The first task in Phase II viII be to assess the impact on total system <br />yield (for the Design Condition) of the folloving: <br /> <br />1. Transmission capaci ty of the Dille Tunnel <br />2. Transmission capaci ty of the Charles Hansen Feeder Canal <br />3. Operation of CBr storage facilities relative to average yield from <br /> \lindy Gap Project <br /> <br />Use of the Dille Tunnel and Charles Hansen Feeder Canal as conveyance <br />facilities for delivering city-ovned ditch vater into the Green Ridge Glade <br />Reservoir viII be evaluated to determine if capacity considerations viII <br />limit the quantity of vater taken into storage. If necessary, the <br />simulation models from Phase I viII be revised in accordance vith the <br />results of this evaluation. <br /> <br />CDM viII also meet vith staff from the Northern Colorado \later Conservancy <br />District (NC\lCD) to reviev operational policies for the CBr Project <br />relative to storage of \lindy Gap vater. If necessary, the models from <br />Phase I viII also be revised to better reflect the availability of \lindy <br />Gap vater. <br /> <br />2-2 <br />