Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PHASE II - TASK 8: EVALUATION OF <br />YIELDS AND COSTS OF MULTI-ELEMENT <br />ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />TASK DESCRIPTION: <br /> <br />Each of the three multi-element alternatives <br />formulated in Task 7 will be evaluated on the basis <br />of: (a) Yielo, (b) Costs, (c) Social Issues and (d) <br />Environmental Issues. Task 8 will include the yield <br />and cost components of this evaluation process. The <br />yield of eacb multi-element alternative will be <br />evaluated such that the deficit under Design <br />Conditions will be eliminated. Therefore, each <br />alternative will be considered equal in rank by yield <br />since the level of Plan Element(s) implementation <br />considered will result in a net yield (and deficit) <br />of zero (0). Cost considerations will be made based <br />on 1987 equivalent dollars. The cost of each <br />alternative will be estimated as the sum of <br />acquisitional costs (including land acquisition, road <br />relocations, and potential improvements to water <br />conveyance systems), design, construction and <br />engineering costs (related to development of each <br />alternative), and costs related to annual operation <br />and repair, and replacement costs. <br /> <br />TASK OBJECTIVE: <br /> <br />The objective of this task is <br />quantitative evaluation of each <br />alternative based on net system yield <br /> <br />to provide a <br />multi-element <br />and cos to <br /> <br />METHODOLOGY: <br /> <br />Yield: <br /> <br />Vhere appropriate, the net system yield of each multi-element alternative <br />will be evaluated utilizing the water supply model(s) revised in Task 2. <br />The levels of Plan Elements(s) implementation considered in each <br />alternative will be refined through an iterative process, in which the <br />levels of implementation will be determined which will result in a yield <br />(and deficit) of zero (0) at minimuJII cost. Each alternative will then be <br />considered equal in terms of producing the required yield, and <br />consequently, may be evaluated ano ranked in this and subsequent tasks <br />according to cost, social issues, and environmental issues. <br /> <br />3-20 <br />