Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CARLSO!':. HANMOND & PADDOCK <br /> <br />A IT ACHMEN: <br />Agenda Item 7.a.11. <br />January 19, 1994 <br /> <br />Daries C. lile, P.E. <br />Colorado Uater,Conservation Board <br />January S. 1994 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />In order to have the storage restriction lifted, the Company <br />needs to design new remedial measures that will effectively reduce <br />or eliminate the embankment seepage. To this end, the company <br />contacted the consulting engineering firm of HARZA Northwest, Inc. <br />which successfully designed and implemented repairs for Rio Grande <br />Reservoir in 1988 and in 1993. HARZA was provided available <br />information on Continental Dam and was asked to make. recommen- <br />dations on the cause of and potential solutions to the on-going <br />seepage problem at Continental Dam. By letter dated October 28, <br />1993, HARZA provided the Company with its analysis of the <br />conditions at Continental Dam and concluded that there was <br />insufficient information available to determine the precise seepage <br />mechanism. HARZA therefore recommended that additional information <br />be obtained on the dam embankment and abutment before any <br />additional repairs are evaluated. A copy of HARZA's letter is <br />attached for your reference. <br /> <br />To collect the necessary information, HARZA recommends the <br />drilling of five cored and sampled bore holes, four in the dam's <br />embankment and one in the left abutment. The four borings into the <br />embankment of the dam would be completed as piezometers for long- <br />term monitoring. The fifth boring would be made into the left <br />abutment of the dam for purposes of determining the conditions in <br />the abutment and the mechanisms for flow of water through the <br />abutment and into the dam embankment. The information obtained <br />from. these borings would, in the judgment of HARZA, be sufficient <br />to allow it to design repairs that would minimize seepage and <br />achieve an effective factor of safety for the dam. The cost of <br />this initial data collection is estimated to be $48,500. <br /> <br />The Company requests the Water Conservation Board to loan it <br />one-half of the cost and to make a grant for one-half of the cost <br />for this additional feasibillty study. The Company proposes to <br />repay its share of the feasibility study in cash. In order to make <br />cash available for this purpose, the company requests a one-year <br />deferral of its scheduled 1994 payment of $33,175.48 to the Board <br />under Contract No. C-l53386, or one-half of the study cost, <br />whichever is less. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The Company believes that a grant of one-half of the study <br />cost is justified because of the importance to the state of <br />Colorado in preserving pre-compact storage in the San Luis Valley. <br />Continental Reservoir is one of only three reservoirs of any size <br />on the Rio Grande that pre-dates the Rio Grande Compact. Under the <br />Rio Grande Compact, reservoirs constructed prior to 1929 operate <br />free of any restraint on storage so long as Colorado is in <br />