My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00040
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00040
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:04 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:30:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153446
Contractor Name
Grand Mesa Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
0
County
Delta
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />il <br /> <br />Economic and financial feasibility evaluations were not within the scope of the <br />present study, If further studies are conducted for this project, such studies would <br />be performed at that time, <br /> <br />Section 3: Objectives <br /> <br />The Grand Mesa Water Supply Study closely relates to an earlier study sponsored by <br />the CWCB and GMWCD, This study was completed in April 1983 and titled Grand <br />Mesa Proiect Feasibility Report, The purpose of the latest study was to examine <br />significant aspects of improved irrigation in the Tongue and Surface Creek basins <br />which were not considered in the 1983 report. The recent study was also conducted <br />to refine the degree of accuracy of hydrologic and related analysis to supplement <br />and complement the 1983 report, However, the study was not intended to <br />duplicate any work which has already been effectively and adequately accom- <br />plished, nor to reopen discussion of plans which were examined in the past by the <br />USBR, but were found to be too costly for economic justification, For this reason, <br />the consultant maximized the use of available data in order to conduct an efficient <br />and cost effective study. Collection of new data by means of field work within the <br />project area was minimal, <br /> <br />Pursuant to the basic purpose of exammmg aspects not considered in 1983, the <br />consultant analyzed four major strategies: <br /> <br />o Evaluate alternative capacities of new storage, <br /> <br />o Review alternative sites for such storage in order to increase the degree of <br />assurance that the Cactus Park site was, in fact, the most suitable. <br /> <br />o Determine whether part of the water to be impounded in a new reservoir <br />would have to be transferred from a neighboring basin or whether water <br />available for development from within the basin is adequate. <br /> <br />1-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.