My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00029
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00029
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:04 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:30:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153643
Contractor Name
Morgan County Quality Water District
Water District
0
County
Morgan
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Contract Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Morton W. Bittinger <br />JWle 18, 1975 <br />Page four <br /> <br />32. Page 1. It is agreed with the author that legal advice <br />should be sought as indicated. Should such advice not have already <br />been sought and the result included in the study? <br /> <br />33. Page 5. Same comment as comment 15 regarding the date of <br />the analysis. <br /> <br />34. For figure 2, same comment as comment 2. <br /> <br />35. Page 7. Estimate for water storage in Camp Creek does <br />not agree with report by NHPQ. Please compare figures and indicate why <br />new figures preferred. Also, please indicate if the reference is only <br />made to the Chadron formation. <br /> <br />36. Page 8. . Please add to the legend and explain: <br /> <br />37 . Page 9. If geologic formations could also be indicated <br />a clearer picture could be obtained. Have there been any pumping tests <br />in the area and are there any results available? . <br /> <br />38. Page 10. Designated basin status. After contacting the <br />State Engineer's office I was assured that there is no confusion in <br />their office regarding the status of designated basins. Please explain <br />your statement better. <br /> <br />39. Page 12. How could we be certain that the measured con- <br />centration does reflect aquifer concentrations? <br /> <br />40. Page 13. How was the figure of 7,500 AF arrived at? <br /> <br />41. Page 14. Indicate extra data to show what the saturated <br />thickness is really estimated to be. <br /> <br />42. Page 27. Hay Gulch alluvium. Limited safe yield in <br />December 1973, 1,500 AF/year. Any revised figures? <br /> <br />As regards the Environmental Impact Report, I enclose herewith <br />s~ "Draft" Guidelines for your further guidance. <br /> <br />I would be very pleased if you could consider the above <br />comments and could make whatever changes may be necessary. Also, if <br />you would like to discuss any of them, please feel free to write or call. <br />UnfortWlately due to another conmdtlIlE!nt, I cannot meet with you on <br />JWle 24, 1975. <br /> <br />Very truly yours, <br /> <br />NCI:unn <br />Ene. <br /> <br />($gd) N. C. IO.'\NNlDFS. <br /> <br />N. C. Ioannides <br />Water Resource Engineer V <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.