Laserfiche WebLink
<br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SU~ARY <br /> <br />The City of ~tontrose, through its Cormmnity Development and Planning <br />Departments, is engaged in a cooperative program with the Colorado Water <br />COn<;ervation Board and the Departrnent of Local Affairs to collect and <br />analyze storm runoff and floodplain information for intellige nt and orderly <br />planning of future storm drainage facilities. <br />Thiseffortisbeingconductedinatwo-phasedapproach. The pre- <br />viously completed first phase was directed to gathering the basic facts <br />(Reference 1). Hyctrologicand hydraulic analyses were conducted to deter- <br />mine water surface elevations and to delineate the flooded area boundaries <br />to reduce potential flooddallldges. This second phase is directed toward <br />formulating alternate flood control and drainage plans forwiser. .anagerrent <br />ofthefloodp1ainandrapidlydevelopingurbandrainageareainandaround <br />the City of Montrose. <br /> <br />This report presents a plan to reduce flood damage in the City of <br />Montrosewilter service area. This area is affected by the flood flows <br />from Cedar Creek, Montrose Arroyo, and Dry Cedar Creek. At the present <br />ti~e, the culvert crossings on Montrose Arroyo dre insufficient to pass <br />the lOO-year flow; consequently, during such an event, a considerable <br />arnountof flow,lould be lost from the cha.nnel to flow overland. Thi, <br />Shallow flooding would flow away from Montrose Arroyo west, and north- <br />west toward the Uncompahgre River, resulting in average annual damQges <br />to residential andcorranercial areas in the amount of $198,000. There <br />is also some overflow from Cedar Creek in Montrose due to insufficient <br />culvert capacity, which causes $24,000 in average annual damages. The <br /> <br />flood dalllaqes Cd used by Dry Cedar Creek are estimated to be minim al. The <br /> <br />recolTl1lended Flood Control Plan consists of iOlproving ten culverts on Mont- <br />rose Arrovo. and onl' on Cedar Creek. This plJn would eliminate structural <br />damage from floods up to the 100-yearevent. The economic evaluation was <br />completed based on the following criteria: 73/8% interest rate; project <br />life of 50~years; and 1980 dollar base. This economic analysis yields <br />benefit-cost ratios of 1.20 and 2.49 fOI'Montrose Arroyo and Cedar Creek <br /> <br />Au ~hori za tion <br />This report "dS ..utilol'i ,"'0 by til'" Colurddo Water Conservation ~Qard <br />In joint sponsorShip with the City of Nontl'ose, Colorado, and Montr ose <br />County, and the Colorado Department of Local Affairs. Specific tasks were <br />performed according to the terms of a contract between the C010l'o.oo Water <br />Conservation Bodrd and Gingery Associates, Inc. dated March 1, ]980. The <br /> <br />respectively. <br /> <br />iX",,'0"p<JweranddutY1S: <br />"...todevise and formulatemethods,rneans and plans for bringing <br />aboutthl'gl'eaterlltilizationottnewatersot the state and thepr e- <br />vention of flooddalllages therefrom and to designate ana approve <br />storm or floouwdy runoff channels or hasins. and to ~ake such desig- <br />nations available to legislative bodies of cities and incorporated <br />towns; to county planning conmissions; and to boards of adjustment <br /> <br />.j. <br /> <br />4 <br />